Register Now! Help

Logo




Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

Emergency Venting Load Reliving temperature for emergency venting rate calculation for low pr #

User is offline   Nirav 

  • ChE Jedi
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 114
  • Joined: 03-July 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:India
Reputation: 2
Neutral

Post icon  Posted 02 February 2007 - 01:48 AM

API 2000, clause 4.3.3.2.2, tanks having surface area >= 260 square meter and design pressure <= 0.07 barg, required venting capacity is 19910 Nm3/hr of equivalent air.

Also Emergency venting capacity for low pressure tank is derived from following Equation 1B of API 2000, clause 4.3.3.2.1

Nm3/hr = 881.55 x QF/L x (T/M)^0.5}

Now here,

Q = heat input = 4129700 watts (For tanks having wetted surface >= 260 square meter and design pressure <= 0.07 bar g) as per API 2000, Appendix B.
F = environment factor
L = latent heat of vaporisation
T = Reliving temperature of vapor at reliving pressure (If it is not know than considered bubble point of stored liquid)
M = Molecular weight of vapor

Now when we calculate venting capacity by above said two method using hexane as a stored liquid we are getting different venting rate.

So what approch we should considered for emergency venting rate calculation for other liquids having very high bubble point.?
Warm regards,

Nirav Kholiya
"How you think about a problem is more important than the problem itself."
0


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Other Replies To This Topic

User is offline   proinwv 

  • ChE Jedi
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 217
  • Joined: 24-October 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:WV, USA
Reputation: 2
Neutral

Posted 06 February 2007 - 04:50 PM

Nirav, sorry for the late reply.

The standard says that 4.3.3.2.2 has "a lesser degree of accuracy" and also please read Appendix B.

Then keep in mind that under the best of circumstances these are still estimates and that emergency venting equipment is very inexpensive when compared to the value of the stored product, the equipment and not the least, the human life and welfare.

I would always be conservative with emergency venting as it is the last line of defense between an intact and a ruptured tank.

This may not be a scientific analysis of the code, and if you need that you should at least go to this link

http://committees.ap...tech/index.html

as well as

http://committees.ap.../tech/reti.html

and also click onto the link at the bottom of that page for STD 2000 and look that spreadsheet over for general background.
Paul Ostand
My Webpage
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic


  Topic Forum Started By Stats Last Post Info
New Replies Air Scouring Rate For Backwash Industrial Professionals chemic 
  • 1 Reply
  • 562 Views
New Replies Rupture Disk
What is the criteria for installing rupture disk horizentally?
Relief Devices Forum jahanlou 
  • 8 Replies
  • 1,516 Views
*New Replies Boiler Internal Re-circulation Rate Industrial Professionals Guest_Ahmed_* 
  • 0 Replies
  • 1,152 Views
New Replies Attachments How To Create An X/y Equilibrium Curve From A Partial Pressure Co2/x G
for MEA / CO2
Student Ejones 
  • 1 Reply
  • 1,179 Views
New Replies Exchanger Type Reformer Student designer 
  • 0 Replies
  • 1,223 Views

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users