ChE Forums: Flutter Of Storage Tank Vents - ChE Forums

Jump to content




Community Message: When you receive recommendations for action in the forums, please return to the forum and share the results of your actions. What recommendations were implemented? What additional action was necessary? Tell everyone what happened so we can all continue to learn.

LEARN ABOUT OUR NEW FORUM SYSTEM HERE

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Flutter Of Storage Tank Vents What is the "Flutter Zone"?

#1 User is offline   Steven McIntosh 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 11-May 09
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 14 May 2009 - 01:20 PM

I'm looking for a definition of flutter as it relates to storage tank vents. My Protectoseal ® pro-flo II ™ software says that for certain combinations of flow, design pressure and set pressure all choices of vent style and size are in the "flutter zone". So, I'm looking for some info on just how bad is it to be in the "flutter zone". I've discovered one way out is to keep lowering the set pressure, but this isn't always desirable.
thanks,
Steven McIntosh
0


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Other Replies To This Topic

#2 User is offline   proinwv 

  • ChE Jedi
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 204
  • Joined: 24-October 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:WV, USA
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 14 May 2009 - 02:03 PM

Thanks Steve,

All of the common pallet loaded vents will flutter when operated close to the seat, or at very low flow rates as compared to the vent capacity. What happens is that the vent opens at the "setrpoint" and if oversized for the application or the actual flow to be vented, then it immediately vents and drops the pressure back to a reseat pressure. This is followed by a rise in pressure and the vent reopens, and the cycle repeats itself.

Using a smaller vent will avoid this, but there may be times when it will still happen.

The result is additional wear on the seat and stem or bearings due to the additional seating and wear cycles.

Paul

Paul Ostand
My Webpage
0

#3 User is offline   Steven McIntosh 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 11-May 09
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 14 May 2009 - 02:32 PM

Thank you Paul. I'm going to have to get back with you after a little more study. Everything you wrote makes perfectly good sense, but it's not exactly in-line with the results of the program from Protectoseal ®. (good program by the way) For example, without changing the size of the vent I simply had to lower the set pressure to get out of flutter. I suppose that could be considered to be taking the vent from over-sized down to proper sized.
I hope to have more to write by next Monday. In the mean-time, if you come across any "literature" definitions of flutter they might be helpful. I'm also wanting to learn more about inlet and exit dP and their impact on vents.
thanks again.
Steve
0

#4 User is offline   djack77494 

  • ChE Jedi
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,157
  • Joined: 29-July 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Anchorage, Alaska
Reputation: 8
Neutral

Posted 14 May 2009 - 04:54 PM

Steve
You may find it easier to locate information on safety valve "chatter". I believe that the two (chatter and flutter) are very similar, though you must keep in mind that safety valves tend to "pop" while conservation vents (e.g. Protectoseal) are more like modulating valves.
0

#5 User is offline   proinwv 

  • ChE Jedi
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 204
  • Joined: 24-October 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:WV, USA
Reputation: 0
Neutral

Posted 14 May 2009 - 05:17 PM

Steven

Yes, by dropping the pressure, you require more vent to pass the same volume. I.e. less delta P more Cv required for the same Q.



Paul Ostand
My Webpage
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic


Similar Topics Collapse

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users