Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Effect Of Instrumented Devices On Relief Load Calculation


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
5 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 jprocess

jprocess

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 316 posts

Posted 26 March 2008 - 05:22 PM

Dear All,
When calculating the relief load for each credible scenario this is a common practice that ignore about any help from instrumented devices to reduce the relief load.
But I want to ask that are there any exceptional cases for this common practice?
Your valuable comments are appreciated.
Mojtaba

#2 umeshr

umeshr

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 16 posts

Posted 08 April 2008 - 01:02 PM

We can use the credit of HIPPS (high integrity pressure protection system) at upstream, for relief load calculation. But it depends on the company specifications . eg. we have a relief valve on a trunkline. which is fed by 10 oil wells. This relief valve is sized for the flow rate equivalent to 10% of producing well's HIPPS failure. ie. the RV is sized for a flow rate equal to that of 1 no. well (10% of 10 wells = 1nos.)

reg
umesh.

#3 JoeWong

JoeWong

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 1,223 posts

Posted 09 April 2008 - 06:20 AM

Umeshr,

A simple but important question... you response implied that you have HIPPS on each dedicated well.

HIPPS is provided to replace ultimate protection devices such as PSV in order to avoid excessive relief load... When you apply HIPPS, do you still consider HIPPS failure ?

#4 umeshr

umeshr

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 16 posts

Posted 09 April 2008 - 12:27 PM

Yes based on the process safeguarding philosophy of the company. failure of HIPPS on 10% of total number of wells have to be considered.

Regards
Umesh

#5 jprocess

jprocess

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 316 posts

Posted 09 April 2008 - 05:01 PM

QUOTE (umeshr @ Apr 9 2008, 12:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yes based on the process safeguarding philosophy of the company. failure of HIPPS on 10% of total number of wells have to be considered.

Regards
Umesh


What a stringent philosophy! rolleyes.gif

#6 eilpar

eilpar

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 17 posts

Posted 17 April 2008 - 03:37 AM

Yes. It looks stringent. I had a similar experience. For one of our projects we were to specify the PSV load for the ethylene fractionator column . The column had HIPPS protection to cut down steam to rebolier on column overpressure. The idea was to prevent PSV pop-up to reduce ethylene loss. But our Licensor did not agree to give credit to HIPPS and specified full load. So it could be a matter of Safety philosophy based on ulitimate protection to the vessel. Or it could be a matter of reliability of the HIIPS instrumentation.

Regards

PAR




Similar Topics