JEBradley
Sep 28 2007, 03:27 AM
We had a post a while back asking for clarification about MAWP and design pressure. I scanned this from C.Parry's 'Relief System Handbook' It may be of use.
Click to view attachment
pleckner
Sep 28 2007, 05:14 AM
Yep, pretty much taken right out of API RP 520.
sheiko
Nov 18 2008, 03:34 PM
QUOTE (JEBradley @ Sep 28 2007, 09:27 AM)

We had a post a while back asking for clarification about MAWP and design pressure. I scanned this from C.Parry's 'Relief System Handbook' It may be of use.
Click to view attachmentOverpressure is 21% (not 25% as indicated in the document)
fallah
Nov 19 2008, 04:35 AM
QUOTE (sheiko @ Nov 18 2008, 03:34 PM)

QUOTE (JEBradley @ Sep 28 2007, 09:27 AM)

We had a post a while back asking for clarification about MAWP and design pressure. I scanned this from C.Parry's 'Relief System Handbook' It may be of use.
Click to view attachmentOverpressure is 21% (not 25% as indicated in the document)
May be 25% is overpressure value relevant to liquid relief from TSV.
JoeWong
Nov 19 2008, 05:30 PM
21% accumulation is applicable to fire case...
smalawi
Nov 22 2008, 04:21 AM
Hi,
The API fire case is 21% and prehaps it has 3% for the line ?? not sure there
By the way in other standards such as the UK, the fire case has lower number ~ 16% if I recall correctly.
Actually the API is a guide not standard but its widely regarded
cheers,
SM
gvdlans
Nov 22 2008, 06:14 AM
The figure from Parry shows a special case where the relief valve set pressure is below the design pressure of the system.
fallah
Nov 22 2008, 06:24 AM
QUOTE (smalawi @ Nov 22 2008, 04:21 AM)

Actually the API is a guide not standard but its widely regarded
cheers,
SM
Recent issuance of API (e.g 521) has been labled as standard.
JoeWong
Nov 22 2008, 08:13 PM
Base on API,
Inlet line pressure drop shall be less than 3% of set pressure based on rated flow of selected PSV.
Maximum allowable pressure accumulation shall be 121% of set pressure for fire contingency.
Recent release 2007 plus addendum May 2008 has changed from RP to STD for API 521. Nevertheless, API 520 still remain as RP.
sheiko
Nov 29 2008, 06:08 PM
My 2-cents:
Some publications are labeled as "Recommended Practices" or "Standards" [for example, API publications], some are called Codes (for example ASME VIII Div 1 & 2). Codes use such words as shall. Standards use words like should. Codes are respected more in the court of law. So there is not much difference between RPs and STDs: they are not law and only provide guidelines that help reaching legal requirements of codes.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.