Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


ChExpress Blog - 5/14/13

Read the latest news from the chemical industry in Christa's blog.

Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Heat Loss from Pipes

Atmospheric Storage Tank Inlet Nozzle


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
14 replies to this topic
Share this topic:

#1 deepakrraj

deepakrraj

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 29 April 2012 - 07:39 AM

Dear all,
Is there any Nozzle Criteria for Atmospheric Storage Tank Inlet Nozzle?Because we planned to increase pumping in capacity to the floating roof storage tank.As per the revised flow rate the Rho v2 becomes 43000.Its acceptable?

#2 ankur2061

ankur2061

    Gold Member

  • Forum Moderator
  • 1,993 posts

Posted 29 April 2012 - 11:58 AM

deepakrraj,

Please refer the link below for an answer to your query:

http://www.cheresour...-nozzle-sizing/

Regards,
Ankur.

#3 deepakrraj

deepakrraj

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 05 May 2012 - 03:54 AM

Thank you Mr.Ankur Srivastava.But in the topic its not clear about the maximum acceptable rhov2 .Please clarify me....

#4 ankur2061

ankur2061

    Gold Member

  • Forum Moderator
  • 1,993 posts

Posted 05 May 2012 - 09:12 AM

deepakrraj,

I have no means to qualify the rhov2 value of 43,000 as acceptable or not. Post # 4 in the link provided in my response to you mentions that momentum values are not critical since there is less or insignificant concern related to separation of phases, liquid entrainment & mechanical vibration due to large open area of discharge inside the tank.

Momentum values are very well defined for two-phase and 3-pahse separators for 2-phase flow in Shell Design Engineering Practice DEP 31.22.05.11-Gen.

I guess that if you are faced with high momentum values you could increase the inlet nozzle size by one or two sizes bigger than the inlet pipe size.

Ultimately the static mechanical engineer will have to make a decision on how to strengthen the nozzle e.g providing truss support to the nozzle in case the momentum values are unavoidably high.

Regards,
Ankur

#5 deepakrraj

deepakrraj

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 06 May 2012 - 07:37 AM

Dear Mr.Ankur Srivastava the problem is we experience noise in the nozzle area.Before that rhoV2 is about 10000.After the flow rate was increased we experience some problems.

#6 S.AHMAD

S.AHMAD

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 596 posts

Posted 06 May 2012 - 07:37 PM

Dear Raj
1. Is the inlet nozzle equipped with "diffuser"?.
2. If not, diffuser shall be helpful in reducing the noise level.
3. If yes, then ensure that the velocity per slot is 1 ft/s or less otherwise increase the number of slots e.g increase the length of the nozzle diffuser accordingly.

#7 deepakrraj

deepakrraj

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 03:59 AM

Dear Mr.Ahmad,
1.The inlet nozzle is not provided with diffuser.
2.We plan to provide two inlets to the tank.Its advisable?

#8 jrtailor09

jrtailor09

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 121 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:39 AM

Deepakraj,

You are increasing the inlet flow rate so, Outbreathing rate is also increse accordingly.
Please do check your existing PVRV size also whether existing valve able to take care revised flow rate as per API 2000.

For others :

I felt that rhov2 value usually check for two phase line. Is it aplicable for single phase line also ? Please inform & correct me.

Regards,

Jatin

#9 deepakrraj

deepakrraj

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 07:40 AM

Dear Mr.Jatin
1.This is floating roof tank.
2.Sorry. i have no idea about Rhov2 criteria.

#10 S.AHMAD

S.AHMAD

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 596 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 07:55 PM

Dear Raj
1. Reducing the velocity through the nozzle is the right direction.
2. Increasing the number of inlet nozzle certainly helpful in eliminating the noise since noise is normally related to vibration induced by high velocity.
3. If room is available, install the nozzle in opposite site. This will improve mixing.

#11 deepakrraj

deepakrraj

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 10 May 2012 - 05:47 AM

Thank you Mr.Ahmad.
1.We planned to provide another inlet through spare nozzle available near by the existing nozzle.

#12 jrtailor09

jrtailor09

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 121 posts

Posted 13 May 2012 - 03:30 AM

Deepakraj,

Sorry, I have not noticed floating roof tank.

Please do check your Size & No. of bleeder vent.This is also depend upon the inlet & outlet flow rate of tank because in your case inlet flow rate is increasing.

Rest all member

Regarding Rhov2 criteria please give your suggestion.


Regards,

Edited by jrtailor09, 13 May 2012 - 04:59 AM.


#13 vikramltv

vikramltv

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 51 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:36 AM

Dear jrtailor09
as per my company standered mixed flow line have rho*v2 criteria as 14900 for continous services and 23300 for intermittent service..and this criteria is also accepted by many process licensors..

#14 vikramltv

vikramltv

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 51 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:37 AM

Dear jrtailor09
as per my company standered mixed flow line have rho*v2 criteria as 14900 for continous services and 23300 for intermittent service..and this criteria is also accepted by many process licensors..

#15 deepakrraj

deepakrraj

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:36 AM

Dear Mr.jrtailor09,
Thanks.I forget to check that.Bleeder vent only comes in line when the floating roof reaches the maximum level or minimum level...... right?




Similar Topics