Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

- - - - -

Transfer Rate, Service / Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 jatinder

jatinder

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 94 posts

Posted 15 July 2014 - 08:04 AM

Dear All,

 

I have a question regarding shell and tube heat exchanger. I did a case using Aspentech Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger software. please find attached result datasheet for your consideration.

 

I can't understand few things from the datasheet. They are as follow:

 

1 - Transfer rate, serivce - 185,7 W/(m2K)

2 - Dirty - 143.3 W/(m2K)

3 - Clean - 143.3 W/(m2K)

 

The area is fixed and Heat exchanged  = 180 kW

 

What does three three different values represent i.e. transfer rate serivce, dirty and clean?

 

Does Transfer rate, service (185.7 W/(m2K)) MEANS the required transfer for this particular process?

 

At clean service (no fouling), Total U = 143.3 W/(m2K)

 

So Required rate for this process = clean / transfer rate service = 143.3 / 185.7  = 77%

 

(100% - 77%) = 23%

 

So does that means my heat exchangers are 23% under designed?

 

Any suggestions?

 

Thank you very much to all,

 

Regards

 

Jatinder

 

 

 

Attached Files



#2 PingPong

PingPong

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 1,446 posts

Posted 15 July 2014 - 08:21 AM

Yes, it means that you would need a U of 185.7 whereas even clean you only have a U of 143.3

 

When you specify a proper fouling resistance for shell and tube side the exchanger is even more under designed than 23 %.

All assuming that Aspen is correct, of course.

 

Note also that a tube side velocity of only 0.08 m/s indicates a terrible design.



#3 jatinder

jatinder

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 94 posts

Posted 15 July 2014 - 09:11 AM

PingPong,

 

Thank you very much for your reply.

 

Well I do understand that it is underdesigned. My clean value must be larger than the rate transfer value.

 

But the funny thing is that HTRI and Aspen gives different results for these values.

 

Cheers






Similar Topics