Thanks very much Fallah for your guidance.
Thanks a lot Art. I actually read your message and replied however I am not sure why you didn't receive it. Anyways, now I learnt how to do it.
I attached a higher quality picture of the sketch.
Fallah: As you mentioned there is a 6" vent on the Pop Tank. I performed a calculation and confirmed the vent size for the worst case relief scenario.
Art: In Canada, it is common to tie the PSVs into a tank which is open to atmosphere and is called Pop Tank (or sometimes Relief Tank). I have seen this arrangement in some of the projects that I have worked on. In this case, PSV on the inlet line to the test separator is connected to Pop Tank because it contains both liquid and gas. Since the liquid flow rate is quite high we need a very big Flare Knock out Drum. However, by connecting this PSV to Pop Tank we can save costs by having a smaller FKOD.
Let me clarify my question. In the sketch as you see there used to be a connection from the Pop Tank to
a recycle pump which used to recycle the Pop Tank liquids back to the process. Now this line is demolished. My guess is that the liquid seal was related to an issue with this connection. In the even of PSV release from the test separator, a two phase flow will be generated and will fill the connection line to the Pop Tank. In the absence of liquid seal, the gas portion of this two phase flow might travel to the recycle pump suction (considering that PSV and Recycle Pump share the same nozzle connection) and get trapped there. However in the presence of liquid seal, if the seal liquid level is higher than pump suction, it will prevent the gas from being trapped in pump suction line. Since the recycle pump line is demolished now I think we can remove the liquid seal.
I just would like to know whether anyone has faced a similar arrangement before and whether there is any justifiable reason for the presence of liquid seal in the Pop Tank?
Thanks,
Amin
Edited by Amin Va, 22 August 2014 - 02:44 AM.