A non-slam check valve is usually specified for compressor discharge because it will have very rapid closure times. This will in turn minimise the volume of return flow that would need to be handled by the anti-surge line in the event of a failure. In this way the check valve actually forms an integral part of your anti-surge loop.
Dual-plate check valves can and have been used in this service for many years and they will work fine. Manufacturers will often offer a range of spring torques and it is important that a strong torque is selected otherwise the dynamic characteristic of the valve will be lost and you will be left with a poor system.
Just to reinforce, a check valve in this application does not simply prevent reverse flow. So using a nozzle valve will allow you to have a much more effective compressor control system.. but a DPCV will work.
If you have chosen the dual-plate then I agree with RStack - not all valves are the same. The Duo-Check has a good name, although it has had problems in compression systems. The plates will strike the stop pin on opening - the high acceleration forces encountered at compressor discharge mean the pins can end up getting bent. This issue can be resolved with the long face-to-face option (Crane would probably offer this) to reduce the leverage force (but the result is a more expensive valve).
Goodwin Dual Plates are another good name. They're valves are specifically designed for compressor service and are available as a wafer option so the cost should be significantly less.
I hope this has been useful.