Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Differential Pressure Across Prereformer


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 kamranarif

kamranarif

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 7 posts

Posted 30 October 2014 - 02:30 AM

We have observed exponential rise in pre reformer (at ammonia plant) pressure drop within 10 days. It may me noted that it is gradually increasing daily. As of now it has been increased from 0.4 to 2 kg/cm2.

Detailed analysis revealed no change in catalyst activity and its performance is consistent

 

Please share your experiences on the same



#2 PingPong

PingPong

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 1,446 posts

Posted 30 October 2014 - 05:30 AM

I would guess that catalyst bed fouling is the most likely cause.

Due to a change in the composition of the feedstock (such as more heavies and/or aromatics, or more ...... other contaminents).



#3 kamranarif

kamranarif

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 7 posts

Posted 30 October 2014 - 05:56 AM

Thanks for your response. Would not this also effect the upstream reactors i-e NiMo/ CoMo bed and ZnO bed. It may be noted that no change has been observed in these reactors 



#4 PingPong

PingPong

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 1,446 posts

Posted 30 October 2014 - 07:22 AM

Prereformer operates at much higher temperature than HDS and ZnO.

 

You should compare the compostions of the original design feedstock, the feedstock before the pressure drop increase, and the feedstock during the pressure drop increase..



#5 kamranarif

kamranarif

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 7 posts

Posted 30 October 2014 - 08:30 AM

Please note that no detectable change in gas quality has been observed. You are requested share any relevant literature, that would be beneficial in trouble shooting.

 

Thanks and regards



#6 rychurek

rychurek

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 45 posts

Posted 01 November 2014 - 05:05 AM

Does streams flow rates( steam, recycle hydrogen and hydrocarbons ) are unchanged? Check pressure drop across reformer too.

#7 kamranarif

kamranarif

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 7 posts

Posted 01 November 2014 - 06:38 AM

Pressure drop Primary reformer is normal. Streams flow rates have been counter verified and are within design limits.

 

Thanks rychurek



#8 kamranarif

kamranarif

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 7 posts

Posted 01 November 2014 - 06:43 AM

New development:

 

We decided to bypass the pre-reformer to check its behavior. After the activity (~2.0 hrs) the pressure drop across pre-reformer reduced from 2.0kg/cm2 to 0.8kg/cm2,. However, it has started increasing again.


Edited by kamranarif, 01 November 2014 - 06:45 AM.


#9 PingPong

PingPong

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 1,446 posts

Posted 01 November 2014 - 10:22 AM

Could be that the bed expanded a little while being bypassed, resulting in an increase in void fraction, and therefor a decrease in pressure drop. But during renewed operation the bed starts to compact again, void fraction decreases, and pressure drop increases again.



#10 rychurek

rychurek

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 45 posts

Posted 01 November 2014 - 01:38 PM

Are you sure that dp. measurement indication is correct? Is prereformer upstream pressure increase when prereformer dp. Is going up?

#11 mehdi

mehdi

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 18 posts

Posted 09 November 2014 - 10:00 AM

hi dear kamranharif

2 bar delta p is very high that means mor than 70% of catalysy chang to powder

i'm work in ammonia plant but we have not pre reformer so please show me general drawing of your pre reformer

maybe you have blocking in inlet our outlet of device inside of reactor

 

thanks

M.M.A






Similar Topics