Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Crude Oil - Water Separator Vessel

crude oil- water separator

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 paul88

paul88

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 6 posts

Posted 02 February 2015 - 02:42 PM

Hi friends from Cheresources,

 

In designing a crude oil -water separator vessel, some calculation procedures state the following:

A maximum droplet settling velocity of 10 inch/min is used regardless of the computed settling velocity.

 

The issue is:  If we use a coalescer to increase the size of the liquid droplets  ¿ Could we then use a droplet settling velocity higher than 10 inch/min to reduce the length of the separator?  

 

If the computed setling velocity give say like 40 inch/min ¿ can we use let`s say 80% of 40 inch/min to calculate the lengh of the separator vessel? 

 

I appreciate some lights on this subject please.



#2 PingPong

PingPong

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 1,446 posts

Posted 03 February 2015 - 10:55 AM

I don't know which formula you use but usually such formula is based on Stokes Law, which is only appicable for laminar flow. For turbulent flow such formula gives too optimistic results, hence the (rather arbitrairy) limit of 10 inch/min.

 

If you want to calculate the settling of a water droplet in oil more accurately you should use the Drag Coefficient CD for spheres, which is a function of the Reynolds Number of the settling (spherical) droplet:

 

d09127.gif

 

As can be seen in the graph: for laminar flow (Re < 1) the CD is 24/Re, but for higher Re numbers the CD is always higher than 24/Re

 

(In reality a settling droplet is not quite spherical, and moreover there will occur a circulation within the droplet due to the wall friction, but for your purpose this approach should be accurate enough.)


Edited by PingPong, 03 February 2015 - 11:02 AM.


#3 paul88

paul88

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 6 posts

Posted 17 February 2015 - 06:11 PM

PingPong, thank you for answering.

 

I already know the 3 equations to determine the Liq-Liq settling velocity, their application depends on the value of the Reynolds number.

 

But the issue was:

 

Can we use a Liq- Liq settling velocity higher than 10 inch/min to reduce the size of a separator?

 

I got the answer from two equipment suppliers: Costacurta  and Sulzer

They use coalescers to reduce the length of a liquid-liquid separator.

 

This implies that the water droplet settling velocity they calculated and used was higher than 10 inch/min. (They guarantee the separation operation)

 

So 10 inch/min is not a Holy velocity that can not be surpassed as some made me belief.



#4 Bobby Strain

Bobby Strain

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 3,529 posts

Posted 17 February 2015 - 07:28 PM

Not only is it not "Holy", its origin is unknown.

 

Bobby



#5 PingPong

PingPong

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 1,446 posts

Posted 18 February 2015 - 05:35 AM

Can we use a Liq- Liq settling velocity higher than 10 inch/min to reduce the size of a separator?

Yes, if you calculate the settling velocity using a CD as function of Re as I described above.

No, if you use an equation that is actually based on Stokes Law.

 

They use coalescers to reduce the length of a liquid-liquid separator.

A coalescer increases the droplet size, and as we all know: bigger droplets settle faster than small ones.






Similar Topics