Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Intrusive Pipe Line Sparger Sizing

sparger spargining design gas liquid

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 dixit

dixit

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 11 April 2015 - 08:03 AM

Hello, 

 

 I am attempting to size an intrusive pipe line sparger as according to the fourth page of the following document: http://www.mottcorp....esign_guide.pdf

 

The design is to mix ethylene oxide gas through a porous metal sparger into a water pipeline, before entering into a reactor. 

 

The specifications are as follows (obtained from Aspen HYSYS simulation):

 

Ethylene Oxide Gas Flowrate: 32050 kg/hr

Pressure: 2500 kPa (362.59 psig)

Temperature: 290 C (554 F)

Volumetric Flow: 21.11 m3/min (obtained from gas equation with compressibility factor of z = 0.93)

 

Water Flowrate: 264200 kg/hr 

Pressure: 2500 kPa (362.59 psig)

Temperature: 48.44 C (77.432 F)

Volume: 4.37 m3/min

Gallon per Minute (GPM): 1155.15

 

I determined the SCFM to be 10002.71

ACFM = 402.79

 

I used the following site to size the water pipeline: http://www.tlv.com/g...-velocity.html 

 

Yielding the following results:

 

Pipe length: 100 m

Pipe ID: 0.2604 m

Water Velocity: 1.37 m/s

Flow Rate: 262.36 m3/hr

 

Based on the water pipeline, I assumed a sparger diameter of 1 inch, hence determining the liquid linear velocity to be 652.72 FPS (according to the provided equation in the first document linked).

 

The high FPS indicates a gas exit velocity designed to be 50 FPM but for a maximum of 150 FPM.

 

Using this maximum, the sparger area I calculated is then 2.6 feet, but when I try to match my area with a suitable size from the tables provided, it would seem that it is too big. Is it simply a case of an inline sparger not being sufficient for my given process?

 

My excel file is attached for reference, though the layout may be a bit messy.

 

Any help would be appreciated. 

 

Cheers. 

 

Attached Files



#2 Bobby Strain

Bobby Strain

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 3,529 posts

Posted 11 April 2015 - 01:34 PM

Well, sparging EO into water is not the method for producing Ethylene Glycol. The EO is absorbed into water in a contacting tower, then sent to the pipe reactor.

 

Bobby



#3 dixit

dixit

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 11 April 2015 - 05:00 PM

Well, sparging EO into water is not the method for producing Ethylene Glycol. The EO is absorbed into water in a contacting tower, then sent to the pipe reactor.

 

Bobby

 

 

Thanks for your reply, but may I know exactly why a sparging unit cannot be employed? It is something to do with the mass transfer rate not being sufficient?

 

Otherwise, I may just have to design an absorber instead. 



#4 Bobby Strain

Bobby Strain

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 3,529 posts

Posted 11 April 2015 - 08:12 PM

Ethylene glycol is usually produced at an EO facility. The EO is already in water, which is fed to a pipe reactor. So, someone must have mislead you about the process.

 

Bobby






Similar Topics