Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Wetted Surface Area According With Iso 28300 / Api 2000

api 2000 iso 28300 atws wetted surface area calulate

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 fernandocamano

fernandocamano

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 24 April 2015 - 01:00 PM

Hi friends,

 

I know there is been a lot of questions and answers regarding how to calculate the wetted surface area of a tank. However, none of them mention what is written in ISO 28300. So lets take a look at the Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms:

 

wetted area 
surface area of a tank exposed to liquid on the interior and heat from a fire on the exterior
 
So far so good, is pretty clear to me,  now, let's see the calculus, this is where I'm having trouble to figure out, I've been thinking about this for months, really  :( , but can't understand the following:
 
it says:
 
For spheres and spheroids, the wetted area is equal to 55 % of the total surface area or the surface area to a height of 30 ft above grade, whichever is greater
 
For horizontal tanks, the wetted area is equal to 75 % of the total surface area or the surface area to a height of 30 ft above grade, whichever is greater
 
For vertical tanks, the wetted area is equal to the total surface area of the vertical shell to a height of 30 ft above grade
 
So, let's say I have this Vertical Tank:
 
Raidus: 15.6'
height: 18'
 
I'm using the formula for area of a cylinder: 2πrh+2πr2  = 2π*15.6*18+2π(15.6)2  then I susbtract the area of the top and bottom of the tank since it won't be exposed to the fire.
 
The result is =  2940.54 square feet
 
What I don't understand and what is driving me nuts to understand is this last sentence: 
 
"...the wetted area is equal to the total surface area of the vertical shell to a height of 30 ft above grade"
 
To a height of 30 ft,  what this means? that I have to use 30 as my height instead of 18? or what?
 
Now, let's say I have the same Tank but this time is horizontal.  My surface area is the same, 2940.54 square feet right? 
 
ISO 28300 says it is the 75% of the surface, so no prob, 2940.54 * .75 = 1323.24, so far, so good. 
 
Now, same thing, I can't understand the following
 
For horizontal tanks, the wetted area is equal to 75 % of the total surface area or the surface area to a height of 30 ft above grade, whichever is greater
 
"...Or the surface area to a height of 30 ft above grade whichever is greater..."
 
shall I replace the length of my tank with 30 feet in the formula and if it is greater than my previous calculus, should I take this value ?

 

Thanks for your comments and have a great day



#2 fallah

fallah

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 4,952 posts

Posted 24 April 2015 - 01:32 PM

fernando,

 

I think it wants to say if the height of the tank is more than 30 ft, you should get the surface area up to 30 ft elevation from ground; on the other hand, if the height of the tank is below 30 ft, you should get the surface area of the tank at its full elevation which is lower than 30 ft...



#3 breizh

breizh

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 6,340 posts

Posted 24 April 2015 - 08:01 PM

Fernanado ,
Consider this resource too .

Breizh

#4 curious_cat

curious_cat

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 475 posts

Posted 26 April 2015 - 02:09 AM

For horizontal tanks, the wetted area is equal to 75 % of the total surface area or the surface area to a height of 30 ft above grade, whichever is greater

 
"...Or the surface area to a height of 30 ft above grade whichever is greater..."
 
shall I replace the length of my tank with 30 feet in the formula and if it is greater than my previous calculus, should I take this value ?

 

Since both your dimensions are less than 30 ft I don't think you need to account for the 30 ft clause. 






Similar Topics