Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Pressure Safety Valve Inlet And Outlet Line Sizing


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Light

Light

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 49 posts

Posted 14 October 2015 - 09:37 PM

For the line sizing of the inlet line to a Pressure Safety Valve, why do we consider only non-recoverable i.e. frictional losses for pressure drop calculation? Why don't we consider the accelerational and static head losses for it? 

 

Also, what is the logic behind the 3% rule for the inlet line sizing to the PSV?

 

What are the criteria for sizing the outlet line from a PSV? The outlet line is generally larger in size than the inlet line. Any reason for this?

 

 

 

Regards.



#2 samayaraj

samayaraj

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 239 posts

Posted 14 October 2015 - 11:03 PM

Downstream of safety valve will be one or two size bigger than the inlet size. This is because the expanded gas/vapor need to be flown within allowable velocity to avoid pressure buildup. Downstream line may be connected to a header so, frictional losses will be added to it. Hence, you need to reduce/ maintain the velocity within the limit to avoid back pressure buildup in the downstream side.



#3 ChemEng01

ChemEng01

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 84 posts

Posted 15 October 2015 - 12:36 AM

Because;

 

The PSV set pressure should be adjusted for static head. 

 

The inlet line sizing is based on the rated flow through the PSV so no need for acceleration head. 

 

3% rule is based on the pressure that the PSV begins to close (blowdown) The 3% rule is assuming a 3% blowdown. If this inlet loss is too high the PSV may flutter or chatter during relief. The reduced capacity of the PSV including the inlet losses may be acceptable, if not  your equipment will overpressure to set pressure + overpressure + inlet line losses. If the PSV inlet line losses are above 3% you can do a force balance assesment outlined in API 521. If your inlet losses + built up backpressure are less than the maximum allowable overpressure + blowdown the PSV should not experience chatter. 


Edited by ChemEng01, 15 October 2015 - 12:43 AM.


#4 fallah

fallah

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 4,954 posts

Posted 15 October 2015 - 01:02 AM

For the line sizing of the inlet line to a Pressure Safety Valve, why do we consider only non-recoverable i.e. frictional losses for pressure drop calculation? Why don't we consider the accelerational and static head losses for it? 

 

Also, what is the logic behind the 3% rule for the inlet line sizing to the PSV?

 

What are the criteria for sizing the outlet line from a PSV? The outlet line is generally larger in size than the inlet line. Any reason for this?

 

 

Light,

 

If you search this site you will find lots of materials about what you are trying to find...
 






Similar Topics