Hello Steve,
As Mr. Bobby says, pressure requirement will be more governing. I've seen cases when operating at low pressure, say for instant operating pressure 0.3 barg, but process engineers (and they are a group from 3 - 5 years experience!) with a pressure drop exceeding 0.3 barg simply because they stick to velocity criteria and wanting a smaller pipe size. In reality ofcourse, the pressure will start packing backwards and backpressure increases, it will still flow. Then the process system will potentially operate outside design range.
API RP 14E, 5th Edition, Oct 1991, [Section 2, subsection 2.4, page 21] states 60 ft/s but not an absolute criteria. And quote "an approximation of Equation 2.6 can be made when the change in pressure is less than 10% of the inlet pressure..." which leads me to believe that Equation 2.6 (General Pressure drop Equation for Gas phase in API 14E, page 21) is limited to 10% pressure drop criteria, else the equation is not applicable.
Realistically, if you are working on a project with a client, you might want to check if you should comply to your client's post award specification requirement. Most clients are confident with their data collected from operation sites and would strictly stick to their velocity limitations and it is not easy to get a deviation from specification accepted without solid reasons to do so. If it's not in the post award specification, then you will need to state clearly the criteria in the sizing basis to let your client know what you are assuming and all your assumptions must come with a reference and request acceptance. For this case, if you refer to API 14E, then you need to adhere to 60 ft/s, unless you can convince your client that why it can be exceeded. You can also look at it from commercial standpoint, spending massive engineering hours to prove that a one meter long 2" pipe is sufficient or just provide a 3" pipe and satisfy client requirement.
If, this is just an exercise given to you by your supervisor, assume your supervisor is your client and provide sufficient information (never have the misconception that providing more information is better, for example, if momentum criteria is not required by the client, you can suggest for good engineering purpose and allow the client to review and accept, but not force the client to review an extra parameter that they didn't call for. Plus, if it was never a problem, piping meets momentum criteria, meets 10% pressure drop criteria, etc, perhaps it shouldn't be reported in the first place).
Cheerio.
Lai