Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Justification For Using A Common Lp/hp Fkod?

flare knockout drum

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
1 reply to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 KeJoSa2010

KeJoSa2010

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 41 posts

Posted 26 January 2016 - 04:51 PM

Hi,

 

Could one ever justify using a common HP/LP Flare Knockout Drum? In my limited experience, I have seen a common LP/HP flare stacks; however, there have always seen separate knockout drums for the two systems. Has anyone ever seen this approach in use, and if so, what was the justification for doing it?

 

Thanks



#2 Dazzler

Dazzler

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 140 posts

Posted 07 February 2016 - 09:08 PM

Keeping the LP and HP systems separate could arise for example due the temperature of the stream.  The HP gas may have been let down in pressure from something very high and has become very cold, so that stainless steel is needed for mechanical design temperature considerations.

 

Additionally, one stream compared to the other may have water present, or could be corrosive, or have liquids that will need to be pumped away rather allowed to just eventually evaporate.

 

The HP vent system during a major relief scenario may be pressurised due to back pressure to higher than acceptable for the LP relief valves, meaning larger and more complex LP valves and headers are needed.  

 

One needs to clearly understand the sources of the relief streams and their conditions and properties. 

 

I'm sure there are other factors.   Hope this helps.

 

Dazzler






Similar Topics