Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Pump Rated Capacity


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
7 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 processengineer1998

processengineer1998

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 42 posts

Posted 13 October 2016 - 03:34 PM

I am going to size a centrifugal pump to transfer liquid from one plant to another plant through 2 km pipeline.
maximum flowrate which could be transfered by pipeline is limited by downstream plant and is around 40 m3/hr.
since maximum flowrate is fixed , i am not sure that is it still required to consider some margin(e.g. 10%-15%) over this maximum flowrate(40m3/hr) for calculating rated flowrate(44-46m3/hr) of pump?
please advice.
thanks in advance.



#2 Pilesar

Pilesar

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 1,382 posts

Posted 13 October 2016 - 03:57 PM

What are the consequences if the pump is not large enough? A too large pump does not annoy nearly so much as a too small pump. If your chosen impeller size the maximum that will fit, then choose a larger pump case. Impellers erode over time and you cannot count on the pump performance to stay exactly as if it were new. Will the pump operate at or near-below its best efficiency point? Will the downstream plant limit flow by control valve? How certain are your system curve calcs? Will there be a density change with temperature or composition which affects the flow? If I were sizing this, I would want enough safety factor in the pump and motor to cushion for unknowns. There may be more than one right answer to sizing your pump, but including a bit of margin in the sizing is definitely not 'wrong'. A robust design is usually a better choice in the long run than the theoretically optimum design.



#3 Bobby Strain

Bobby Strain

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 3,529 posts

Posted 13 October 2016 - 04:13 PM

Are you providing a new pipeline also?

 

Bobby



#4 processengineer1998

processengineer1998

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 42 posts

Posted 14 October 2016 - 12:08 AM

What are the consequences if the pump is not large enough? A too large pump does not annoy nearly so much as a too small pump. If your chosen impeller size the maximum that will fit, then choose a larger pump case. Impellers erode over time and you cannot count on the pump performance to stay exactly as if it were new. Will the pump operate at or near-below its best efficiency point? Will the downstream plant limit flow by control valve? How certain are your system curve calcs? Will there be a density change with temperature or composition which affects the flow? If I were sizing this, I would want enough safety factor in the pump and motor to cushion for unknowns. There may be more than one right answer to sizing your pump, but including a bit of margin in the sizing is definitely not 'wrong'. A robust design is usually a better choice in the long run than the theoretically optimum design.


Dear Pilesar,
Thanks a lot for your good response to my question, as a conclusion i understood from your explanation and reasons that I should considered some margin for pump as rated flow even if i now the maximum flowrate transfering via pipe line is fixed due to downstream unit limitation(40m3/hr is design of downstream unit).
Now there is another question which i face with.
Downstream of pump we need control valve and some instrumentations, do all of them need to be sized for rated flow (44_46m3/hr) like pump or they could be sized based on maximum flowrate(40m3/h)?what about hydraulic calculation,is it necessary to do hydraulic for both rated and maximum cases?
Thanks
Thanks in advance.

#5 processengineer1998

processengineer1998

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 42 posts

Posted 14 October 2016 - 12:11 AM


Are you providing a new pipeline also?

Bobby

Dear Bobby,
Actually it is an expansion project between two existing plants, so all piping,instrumentation and pump are new.downstream unit will be common for two plants, some time unit will be utilised by one plant and other time by another plant.
Thanks

Edited by processengineer1998, 14 October 2016 - 02:09 AM.


#6 processengineer1998

processengineer1998

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 42 posts

Posted 29 October 2016 - 06:02 AM

thank you very much Pilesar and Bobby



#7 J_Leo

J_Leo

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 262 posts

Posted 30 October 2016 - 09:11 PM

When you do the pump calculation, the pump is in the circuit from source (for example, a vessel), passing through flow element, the control valve, piping, fittings.. to the destination (s). Once you choose one flow rate for hydraulic calculation, it applies to all the items in the circuit. Generally speaking, the pump hydraulic calculations should include all cases, max, normal, even turndown. The hydraulic caculation can also provide infomation for the control valve pressure drop for all cases, which can be used for control valve specification.

 

Regards,

Leo


Edited by J_Leo, 30 October 2016 - 09:36 PM.


#8 ankur2061

ankur2061

    Gold Member

  • Forum Moderator
  • 2,484 posts

Posted 31 October 2016 - 02:36 AM

Hi,

 

Is this a continuous service or intermittent?

 

If continuous, what about minimum safe continuous flow for the pump? Have you considered it? If not, as a rule of thumb I would consider 30% of the maximum flow as that value, which becomes around 12 m3/h in your case. The final value for minimum continuous flow will be given by the pump vendor.

 

In the aforementioned case you will require to add the minimum continuous flow to the maximum transfer rate, if you decide to have a minimum recirculation line with only a restriction orifice in it.

 

If it is an intermittent planned pump transfer, you may ignore the minimum continuous flow requirements.

 

Regards,

Ankur.


Edited by ankur2061, 31 October 2016 - 02:41 AM.





Similar Topics