Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Criteria For Meg Line And Pipeline


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
5 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 processengineer1998

processengineer1998

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 42 posts

Posted 16 October 2016 - 06:35 PM

Hi all
I am looking for some criteria for velocity and pressure drop/100m for MEG in order to perform line sizing for MEG line and pipeline.
I know general criteria for liquids such as what mentioned in TOTAL or others standards, but interesting thing for me is special criteria(velocity and pressure drop/100m) for MEG .
Please let me know if there is such criteria.
Thanks

Edited by processengineer1998, 16 October 2016 - 10:21 PM.


#2 breizh

breizh

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 6,347 posts

Posted 16 October 2016 - 09:10 PM

Hi ,

 

Based on physical properties ( density , viscosity) you should perform hydraulic calculation . Use the search engine in this forum , you will find table or data .

 

Hope this helps

 

Breizh


Edited by breizh, 17 October 2016 - 02:15 AM.


#3 processengineer1998

processengineer1998

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 42 posts

Posted 29 October 2016 - 06:03 AM

thank you breizh



#4 processengineer1998

processengineer1998

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 42 posts

Posted 17 November 2016 - 04:34 AM

Is there any concern about 0.5 to 0.6 m/s?

#5 Saml

Saml

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 301 posts

Posted 17 November 2016 - 04:45 PM

If you are using SS (304L or 316L) you don't have any problem of corrosion, erosion, or passivation layer instability with MEG at usual velocities and moderate temperature (below 100 °C).

The main concern is pressure drop and the power required.

I don't see any issue with 0,6 m/s unless you have a limitation on available pressure drop. Plants that use MEG (like polyester fiber ones) normally use sch 10 SS piping for more than 20 years without problems or loss of thickness.



#6 processengineer1998

processengineer1998

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 42 posts

Posted 28 November 2016 - 02:52 PM

If you are using SS (304L or 316L) you don't have any problem of corrosion, erosion, or passivation layer instability with MEG at usual velocities and moderate temperature (below 100 °C).
The main concern is pressure drop and the power required.
I don't see any issue with 0,6 m/s unless you have a limitation on available pressure drop. Plants that use MEG (like polyester fiber ones) normally use sch 10 SS piping for more than 20 years without problems or loss of thickness.


Dear Samo
Thanks for your responce.
We are going to use carbon steel pipe in moderate temperature below 70C




Similar Topics