Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Reactors In Series


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
9 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 alovera88

alovera88

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 4 posts

Posted 29 July 2008 - 02:36 AM

Hi everyone, I've got a problem where I have a two CSTR's joined together by a pipe that can be considered to be a PFR. I know the volumes of the reactors, the rate constant and the overall conversion, but I'm just stumped how I place all the design equations together (to make an implicit equation) to find out the volumetric flow rate for the desired conversion.

Any hints would be greatly appreciated, as I feel I am almost there.

Thanks.

Alex

(p.s. it is a liquid phase, first order reaction of species A to B.

90% conversion from A to B and there is no B in the feedstock)

#2 Andree

Andree

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 140 posts

Posted 29 July 2008 - 04:11 PM

solve equations:
1) Q*cA0=k*cA1*V1+Q*cA1
2) cA2=cA1*exp[-k*(V2/Q)]
3) Q*cA2=k*cA3*V3+Q*cA3
4) (cA0-cA3)/cA0=0.9

4 equations and for unknown variables: cA1,cA2,cA3,Q - solve for Q

Q - volumetric flow
cAi - concentrations: 0-inlet, 1-after 1st CSTR, 2-after PFR, 3-outlet (after 2nd CSTR)
Vi - volumes of reactors
k - reaction rate constant

#3 alovera88

alovera88

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 4 posts

Posted 04 August 2008 - 09:53 AM

QUOTE (Andree @ Jul 29 2008, 09:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
solve equations:
1) Q*cA0=k*cA1*V1+Q*cA1
2) cA2=cA1*exp[-k*(V2/Q)]
3) Q*cA2=k*cA3*V3+Q*cA3
4) (cA0-cA3)/cA0=0.9

4 equations and for unknown variables: cA1,cA2,cA3,Q - solve for Q

Q - volumetric flow
cAi - concentrations: 0-inlet, 1-after 1st CSTR, 2-after PFR, 3-outlet (after 2nd CSTR)
Vi - volumes of reactors
k - reaction rate constant


Hi, thanks for your reply, will have a look at it when I'm back from a trip.

Much appreciated smile.gif , Alex

#4 alovera88

alovera88

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 4 posts

Posted 06 August 2008 - 04:33 AM

Hey Andree,

jus been trying to work through the equations, but keep getting stuck, maybe my algebra's just rusty.

(1) Q*cA0=k*cA1*V1+Q*cA1
(2) cA2=cA1*exp[-k*(V2/Q)]
(3) Q*cA2=k*cA3*V3+Q*cA3
(4) (cA0-cA3)/cA0=0.9

[Values: V1,V3 = 5m^3
V2 = 11m^3
k = 0.1s^-1 ]

Starting from (4) we know that: cA3 = 0.1 , we can then complete the other equtions:

(1*) Q = (0.5*cA1) / ( 1 - cA1) [or] (1**) cA1 = Q / (0.5 + Q)

(3*) Q = 0.05 / (cA2 - 0.1) [or] (3**) cA2 = (0.05 / Q) + 0.1

Now we put these into equation (2) (1** and 3**) and taking logs to remove the exponent, but i can't seem to get my head around the next bit. Sorry if this seems trivial to you, but it's starting to annoy me as i know it should be relatively easy, but I can't see the solution!

Thanks again for your time.

#5 Andree

Andree

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 140 posts

Posted 06 August 2008 - 04:59 AM

QUOTE (alovera88 @ Aug 6 2008, 10:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Starting from (4) we know that: cA3 = 0.1 , we can then complete the other equtions:


cA3/cA0 = 0.1

#6 Andree

Andree

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 140 posts

Posted 06 August 2008 - 05:08 AM

I suggest solving the system of eqns numerically - analytically can be difficult (maybe even impossible) as you will have "Q" in exponent... I recommend MathCAD, which is very convenient for this purpose.

#7 Andree

Andree

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 140 posts

Posted 08 August 2008 - 04:43 AM

approx. 0.9593 [m3/s] - it seems to be too much (not realistic value unless it is a student task)

#8 alovera88

alovera88

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 4 posts

Posted 08 August 2008 - 07:48 AM

QUOTE (Andree @ Aug 8 2008, 10:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
approx. 0.9593 [m3/s] - it seems to be too much (not realistic value unless it is a student task)


Yeah, it's a student question, but should be able to be answered using just the design equations and I'm sure there must be a simpler way huh.gif

thanks for the answer though, atleast it gives me something to work towards laugh.gif

Alex

#9 Andree

Andree

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 140 posts

Posted 08 August 2008 - 08:45 AM

to avoid wrtiting a numerical code (if you have no access to any math software, i.e. Mathcad or Matlab), you can find solution using simple spreadsheet... put guess value of Q and check if l.h.s of final equation is equal to r.h.s. ;-)

Attached Files



#10 chenblue

chenblue

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 54 posts

Posted 09 August 2008 - 03:05 AM

Excel can be used for iterative calculation.

1. We can simplify Andree's 4 equ's to become 2 equ's, like

Q1=f(Q2)
Q2=f(Q1)

2. Type the two equ's into Excel's two cells.
(Note that Q1 cell and Q2 cell need each other)

3. check the menu command/...Options/Tools/Calculation tab/Iteration checkbox,
select the iterative number(default=100).

It is vary easy, you could try it yourself.




Similar Topics