Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Natural Gas Dehydration With Glycols - Meg Or Teg

gas dydration meg teg absorder contactor glycol

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
8 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Dmitry

Dmitry

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 180 posts

Posted 28 September 2012 - 01:17 AM

Hello,

I am new in gas dehydration with glycols, on our plant we use MEG solution (80 % MEG, 20 % water) to reduce hydrate formation temperature (not for remove water) and propane refrigeration loop to meet water dew point. HC recovery is not an issue for us. We are looking another technology - TEG dehydration with absorber (gas - glycol contactor)m which can be used for only gas dehydration. HC recovery is not an issue. My question is - only TEG (99% mass, or less or bigger) can be used to meet water dew point specification? Can we use MEG solution (80 % MEG, 20 % water) instead of TEG solution ?

Thanks for your answers.
Dmitry

#2 Bobby Strain

Bobby Strain

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 3,529 posts

Posted 28 September 2012 - 11:20 AM

Although you didn't say, it sounds like you are looking to abandon the propane refrigeration. If this is the case, and I see no other reason that you are evaluating alternatives, you will need a TEG contactor and regenerator to meet the typical pipeline gas specification.

Bobby

#3 Art Montemayor

Art Montemayor

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 5,780 posts

Posted 29 September 2012 - 10:59 AM

Dmitry:

If you are proposing to produce pipeline quality natural gas, then the TEG dehydration process is the usual and conventional process applied world-wide. Usually this process is applied on compressed natural gas at 100 barg pressure. Please refer to the countless threads on this topic within our Forums by using the SEARCH feature. You will find a lot of useful information in these past threads, including flow sheets and typical mass balances I have uploaded.

The degree of water removal is determined by your site conditions and pipeline characteristics. Here, in the USA, our pipelines employ a design value of 7 lbs of water/Million Scf of natural gas as the maximum allowed. If you are traversing Siberia with a pipeline, it is obvious you would require a much lower figure. I have used TEG to produce a gas with as low as 3 lb/MMScf. I believe you can achieve even lower values, but this would have to be substantiated.

The triethylene glycol employed as the drying solution is circulated as essentially a 100% pure “Lean” glycol stream into the TEG contactor. You regenerate the subsequent “Rich” solution using a TEG Stripper-Reboiler system that is driven by the heat input into the reboiler. The heat input medium is usually one of 3 options:
  • Direct-fired with natural gas;
  • Thermal fluid;
  • Electric resistance elements.
No one to my knowledge uses “MEG solution”. I seriously doubt that it would work.

#4 Dmitry

Dmitry

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 180 posts

Posted 01 October 2012 - 12:52 AM

Although you didn't say, it sounds like you are looking to abandon the propane refrigeration. If this is the case, and I see no other reason that you are evaluating alternatives, you will need a TEG contactor and regenerator to meet the typical pipeline gas specification.

Bobby



We are happy with propane loop on our EPF, for future gas treatment unit we are looking for another technology, since we do not have too much HC and only want to meet water dew point.

Thnaks

#5 Dmitry

Dmitry

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 180 posts

Posted 01 October 2012 - 12:58 AM

Art Montemayor:

Thanks for reply. In Ukraine we need to meet Dew point temperature of the water at abs. pressure 3,92 MPa ≤ -10°C. Water content can be less or bigger than 3 lb/MMScf. I didn't see MEG solution as well, and just want to understand why only TEG can be used

Regards,
Dmitry

#6 RoyenG

RoyenG

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 32 posts

Posted 01 October 2012 - 03:34 AM

Hi..

For dehydration, MEG is also applicable, but due to some disadvantages such as higher vapor pressure, higher energy requirements and formation of corrosive degradation products compare to TEG, it does not used.

Regards,
Royen

#7 gazepdapi1

gazepdapi1

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 34 posts

Posted 03 October 2012 - 10:12 PM

MEG would have large carry over losses, less dew point depression and regeneration to high concentrations would be difficult due to the low boiling point temperature and therefore easier to degrade as RoyenG mentioned.

#8 Rajkumar Chate

Rajkumar Chate

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 10 posts

Posted 10 October 2012 - 02:39 AM

Not only the water removal but also we have to look in to the regeneration part, to get less than 5 lb/MMSCF of water it needs higher concentration of glycol (moret than 99.85 %). Apart from TEG other solvents can not be regenerated to 99.9% purity due to degradation at higher temperature, however TEG will not have any problem still the temperature of 204 deg C. Hence first choice of solvent is TEG

#9 Nasiruddin

Nasiruddin

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 30 posts

Posted 13 October 2012 - 01:55 AM

Selection of solvent depends on your water dew point requirement. For pipeline quality gas (I assumed dew point less than 7 lb/MMscf), use of 99.8 wt% TEG is common. It may require stripping gas to limit the glycol rebolier temperature to avoid glycol degradation and achieve required purity of TEG.

Regards,
Nasiruddin




Similar Topics