Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

300# Rating


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
1 reply to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Chemitofreak

Chemitofreak

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 291 posts

Posted 11 April 2017 - 11:20 PM

Hi,

 

Why are instruments mounted on equipment and PSV flanges rated for minimum 300# rating.

 

Thanks in advance.



#2 ankur2061

ankur2061

    Gold Member

  • Forum Moderator
  • 2,484 posts

Posted 12 April 2017 - 03:57 AM

Hi,

 

Why are instruments mounted on equipment and PSV flanges rated for minimum 300# rating.

 

Thanks in advance.

That is not a universal rule. Some companies follow this and some don't. The only way to logically explain this is to calculate nozzle loads (allowable forces and moments) based on connected piping / tubing for the PSV / Instrument and then decide the pound rating. However most engineering including vessel design is required to be completed before vendor data including weights for the instruments and / or PSVs is available. By over-designing for pound rating (300#) the design engineer is trying to ensure that the chances of a instrument / PSV nozzle on the vessel not able to bear the nozzle loads is minimized. This is a time saving measure in terms of allowing fabrication of equipment / vessels with higher pound rating for instruments / PSVs directly mounted on equipment / vessels. However, due diligence is required to ensure that if the process requires higher pressures than 300# the nozzle pound rating provided is able to cater to the process requirement.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Regards,

Ankur






Similar Topics