Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

0

Manometer And A Sealed Cylindrical Cavity


5 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Dudesons123

Dudesons123

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 56 posts

Posted 09 August 2017 - 08:16 AM

Hi Scientists and Engineers,

 

I would like to ask the following question I have about fluid flow. I have tried doing a force balance on it and I have also used Bernoulli's equation but to no avail.I just want to know if I'm tackling this problem in the right way or if I don't please help me. I was only given the density of mercury at 13600kgm^-3.

 

Saturated steam at 2 bar enters the top of a sealed cylindrical cavity and condenses, forming a pool of condensate. At the bottom of the cylinder is an exit pipe of diameter 5 cm. This exit pipe is open to the atmosphere, which consists of air at 1 bar. A cone of mass 1 kg blocks this exit, preventing any condensate from draining from the cylinder. The height of the cone that protrudes into the drain is 5 cm. 

 

The volume of a cone of height H and base radius R is πR2H/3. 

 

A manometer which is open to the atmosphere contains 50 cm of mercury. If the condensate level h is equal to 10cm, what is the height of the water level in the manometer with respect to the condensate level (i.e. in the diagram)? 

 

Thanks.

Attached Files


Edited by Dudesons123, 09 August 2017 - 09:16 AM.


#2 Dudesons123

Dudesons123

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 56 posts

Posted 09 August 2017 - 12:40 PM

I'm not entirely sure where to go from here. All I know is that I have reservoir manometer and I am working with a static fluid.

 

Thanks in advance.


Edited by Dudesons123, 09 August 2017 - 12:49 PM.


#3 Francisco Angel

Francisco Angel

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 09 August 2017 - 01:56 PM

Hi:

Didn't a pressure balance at the condensate level do the trick?

 

In the "manometer" side you will have:

 

P_atm+P_mercury+P_condensate( Proportional to l )

 

I the "condensate chamber" side you will have:

 

P_steam.

 

In following questions try to include the statement of the problem (in the attached pictures it seems cut off),  sometimes it contain information that is not indicated in the picture.

Also academic problems sort of "guide" you in the steps to solve them by the order of the subquestions a), B), c), etc. So include that information also.

Best regards.



#4 Dudesons123

Dudesons123

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 56 posts

Posted 09 August 2017 - 02:31 PM

Hi Francisco,

 

Thanks for replying.

 

Here is what I have:

 

Patm + Pmercury +Pcondensate = Psteam

1 bar + 0.667 bar +1000 kgm^-3*9.81 kgms^-2*l= 2 bar

 

l = the difference in height between the top water level height inside the smaller tube and the top water level inside the sealed cylindrical cavity.

 

Re-arranging gives me:

 

l = (2 bar -1 bar - 0.667 bar)*10^5/(1000kgm^-3*9.81 kgms^-2) = 3.39 m 

 

Which is obviously weird considering that we are given fractions of a meter as our known variables.


Edited by Dudesons123, 09 August 2017 - 02:33 PM.


#5 Francisco Angel

Francisco Angel

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 09 August 2017 - 03:23 PM

The procedure seems right, provided the assumptions (like the value of the pressure of the steam over the liquid surface) are right.



#6 Dudesons123

Dudesons123

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 56 posts

Posted 14 August 2017 - 04:43 AM

Hi,

 

Why did we not take into account the cross sectional areas of the tube and the sealed cylindrical cavity to do a force balance on it?

 

Thanks in advance.






Similar Topics