Unlike Bobby Strain, I was a registered PE in Texas for approximately 20 years and I stamped P&IDs while working for E&C companies here in the Houston area. I did the stamping due to client requirements - not because I was legally forced to do so at the time. I understand that the requirements for P&ID generation has now changed in Texas since those times.
My personal feelings and opinions about the need for PE registration here in Texas are quite in line with what Bobby states. I found that the PE board in Texas was basically interested in dictating what they considered and decided what was “professional” engineering - emphasizing the collection of yearly dues (always subject to being increased) and subjecting all members to bureaucratic procedures, dictates, and controls. While I fully understand the potential of engineers doing harm to society through mistakes, errors, wrong decisions, bad organization, and ignorance in their applied designs, I also feel that as professionals we - who are self-driven towards excellence in our profession and are dedicated to doing the best we can do - do not need the supervision and dictatorial edicts of a State Board composed of political and elitist individuals who believe they know more of how our work should be done. I found the controls and demands being imposed by the State Board bordered on private interests making money on mandatory “continuing education” courses that almost everyone involved cheated on. The amount of money required for fees and mandatory courses was substantial and left to the individual engineer to figure out how to pay for this professional expense. No direct action or steps was considered by the Board on making it possible for the engineer to pass on all these mounting expenses to the end user - something that is the unwritten law in U.S. businesses.
Yes, I can see the positive merit of having an engineer take legal responsibility on the accuracy, safety, and applicability of a final P&ID issued for construction. However, I would also insist that the responsibility be compensated for in kind - in other words, payment by the client to allow for costs of the PE license, the fees, the insurance policy, and the justifiable profit for the work performed. Unfortunately, when questioned, the representatives of the State Board would not comment nor offer any explanation for not taking into consideration the compensations due to a registered engineer. Consequently, after some years, I did not renew my registration.
I would hope that in the future the problem of ensuring safe and reliable engineering design and construction will be resolved - but always taking into consideration the just and fair compensation due to any engineer that puts his/her future employment on the line. What is fair and just for the consumer should also be the same for the supplier.
Unfortunately, I found the State Board unwilling - or unable - at that time to address these concerns as well as many others involving the legal responsibilities and repercussions involving the application of engineering stamps.