Dear All,
When calculating the relief load for each credible scenario this is a common practice that ignore about any help from instrumented devices to reduce the relief load.
But I want to ask that are there any exceptional cases for this common practice?
Your valuable comments are appreciated.
Mojtaba
|
|
Effect Of Instrumented Devices On Relief Load Calculation
Started by jprocess, Mar 26 2008 05:22 PM
5 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 26 March 2008 - 05:22 PM
#2
Posted 08 April 2008 - 01:02 PM
We can use the credit of HIPPS (high integrity pressure protection system) at upstream, for relief load calculation. But it depends on the company specifications . eg. we have a relief valve on a trunkline. which is fed by 10 oil wells. This relief valve is sized for the flow rate equivalent to 10% of producing well's HIPPS failure. ie. the RV is sized for a flow rate equal to that of 1 no. well (10% of 10 wells = 1nos.)
reg
umesh.
reg
umesh.
#3
Posted 09 April 2008 - 06:20 AM
Umeshr,
A simple but important question... you response implied that you have HIPPS on each dedicated well.
HIPPS is provided to replace ultimate protection devices such as PSV in order to avoid excessive relief load... When you apply HIPPS, do you still consider HIPPS failure ?
A simple but important question... you response implied that you have HIPPS on each dedicated well.
HIPPS is provided to replace ultimate protection devices such as PSV in order to avoid excessive relief load... When you apply HIPPS, do you still consider HIPPS failure ?
#4
Posted 09 April 2008 - 12:27 PM
Yes based on the process safeguarding philosophy of the company. failure of HIPPS on 10% of total number of wells have to be considered.
Regards
Umesh
Regards
Umesh
#5
Posted 09 April 2008 - 05:01 PM
QUOTE (umeshr @ Apr 9 2008, 12:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yes based on the process safeguarding philosophy of the company. failure of HIPPS on 10% of total number of wells have to be considered.
Regards
Umesh
Regards
Umesh
What a stringent philosophy!
#6
Posted 17 April 2008 - 03:37 AM
Yes. It looks stringent. I had a similar experience. For one of our projects we were to specify the PSV load for the ethylene fractionator column . The column had HIPPS protection to cut down steam to rebolier on column overpressure. The idea was to prevent PSV pop-up to reduce ethylene loss. But our Licensor did not agree to give credit to HIPPS and specified full load. So it could be a matter of Safety philosophy based on ulitimate protection to the vessel. Or it could be a matter of reliability of the HIIPS instrumentation.
Regards
PAR
Regards
PAR
Similar Topics
Thermal Relief Valve For A Fire CaseStarted by Guest_QuantumEng_* , 19 Nov 2025 |
|
|
||
The Basis Of Calculation To 3% Pressure Loss At The Inlet Of PressureStarted by Guest_phoenixmoca_* , 14 Mar 2026 |
|
|
||
Sizing Fire Case Relief Valve Installed Below Liquid LevelStarted by Guest_processrock_* , 14 Apr 2026 |
|
|
||
Surface Area Calculation For Blowdown Orifice Sizing Including FinnedStarted by Guest_victortheone_* , 17 Feb 2026 |
|
|
||
Equal Load Sharing And Anti-Surge ControlStarted by Guest_panoska_* , 02 Nov 2025 |
|
|

FB





