Latest Community Postings
Recent Blog Entries
Ankur's Tech Blog
Community Admin Blog
Energy Efficient Hot and Cold Water
Electrical Process Tomography
Biodiesel: The Road Ahead
Methanol Plant Capacity Enhancement
Plate and Frame Heat Exchangers: Preliminary Design
Compressor Surging Under Control
Plant and Equipment Wellness, Part 1: Observing Variability
Share this topic:
Example 2.2: The Hidden Factory
is an example of the value of identifying causes of variability in a business. In this case the production from a mine is
The eight weeks of production shown on the graph represents 1344 production hours. For 275 of those hours there was no production, which means that for 20% of possible production time the plant was standing still. The plant design capacity is 1500 units per hour. For 615 of the remaining hours it was running at under design rate. This means that for 57% of the time that it was operating it was delivering less than it was designed to produce. The actual average production rate for the entire eight weeks is 1000 units per hour, which is two-thirds of design duty. This facility is suffering severe production problems and investigations need to be made as to why it is not consistently producing at its design capacity.
There is additional information to be garnered from the graph. It is clear that for a significant number of hours the plant ran at above its design rate. The implication is that the plant can comfortably run at more than its design duty. There is a good chance that with minimal engineering changes the plant could run consistently at 2000 units per hour, which is 33% greater than design capacity and 100% higher than current average production.
There are obvious questions to ask of a plant with such variability of performance. Such as, What is causing below design throughput so often? And, If the plant can produce at higher rates by accidents of circumstance, then what could be produced if it was done intentionally? It would be sensible to identify the causes of both the disastrous production losses so they can be solved and the fortuitous accidents of the past so then can be applied intentionally. The total lost capacity represented by the stoppage time and slow throughput, plus the hidden capacity available from higher production rates, means that this operation has plenty of opportunity to deliver a large production increase without significant capital investment.
This companys decision to spend $250,000,000 on a major capital upgrade to boost production 50% may not have been necessary. If the downtimes and low production rates were recovered, and the causes of the higher throughputs were made standard practice, the extra 50% capacity was been achievable with the old plant. It was only necessary to conduct root cause investigations on why the production losses occurred and engineer them out. Combined with an analysis to understand why higher than design production rates occurred and re-engineer the process to deliver them consistently. The financial return on such an investment could be unbelievable. All these options became clear simply by measuring production variability.
To construct a graph like that in Figure 1.5 requires collecting the hourly production figures for a sufficiently long period of time so that the full range of variability affecting the process can be observed. The figures will show a range of performance around a mean value. The extent of the spread below the mean, from average to lowest, will indicate if there are production problems hampering throughput. The spread above the mean, from average to highest, will indicate if there is spare capacity available. If the spread is tight about the mean production rate then the operation is running well and it is performing as it should. But if, as in Figure 1.5, the spread is wide then the plant has hidden opportunities to improve its production performance and efficiencies.
When production throughput graphs have a wide spread of production rates there is potential to increase plant capacity by removing the causes of operating losses with minor engineering upgrades and removing variability by adopting improved procedures and extensive training. Before investing more capital to expand plant capacity, investigate the variability of current production because there may already be a hidden factory within the existing plant.
By: Mike Sondalini, Enterprise Asset Management Columnist for Cheresources.com
Send this Page to a Friend
|Advertise with Us|
|The Chemical Engineers' Resource Page, 1442 Goswick Ridge
Road, Midlothian, VA 23114, Email
All material is Copyright © 2008, www.cheresources.com