Newest Articles
ChExpress-March 4, 2010
ChExpress-February 18, 2010
ChExpress-February 4, 2010
ChExpress-January 21, 2010
ChExpress-January 7, 2010
ChExpress-December 8, 2009
ChExpress-November 10, 2009
Energy Efficient Hot and Cold Water
Electrical Process Tomography
Biodiesel: The Road Ahead
Methanol Plant Capacity Enhancement
Plate and Frame Heat Exchangers: Preliminary Design
Compressor Surging Under Control
Plant and Equipment Wellness, Part 1: Observing Variability



banner2.gif (6526 bytes)

ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS: SACCHARIN VS. ASPARTAME

Article Update: 3/31/2003
Since this article was originally published, some longer terms research and market experience has shown that Nutrasweet is not a safe alternative to sugar for everyone.  Some people have reported severe side effects from Nutrasweet (aspartame) as well as from saccharin. 

Now, there is a new sweetner on the market called "Splenda" which is composed of a chemical called sucralose.  Essentially, sugar is fed to a processing plant and the sugar molecules are chlorinated and rearranged.  Sucralose is not recognized as sugar in the body, thus is does not raise glucose level which is a key concern for people suffering from diabetes.  Currently, no long term, reliable research data is available for Splenda. 

As you continue to browse the internet and seek further information on artificial sweetners, you'll see opinions from everyone.  Some will make it a point to emphasize that Splenda contains chlorine.  Keep in mind that just because a chemical compound contains chlorine, does not necessarily make it evil.  Is Splenda safe?  The truth is that no one really knows.  If you browse the internet on this topic long enough, you'll be scared to eat anything!  As is always the case, consumption in moderation is the best course of action.  If you have to use an artificial sweetner at this time, you have several choice.  Some have long term research and some do not.   You'll have to make an informed decision. 

     You're probably familiar with NutrasweetTM and Sweet & LowTM and perhaps a few other artificial sweeteners.  Ever wonder if they're safe?  Well, the major ingredient in Sweet & LowTM (which comes in the characteristic pink pack) is a chemical called Saccharin.  The People's
Republic of China is officially given credit for Saccharin's development, but they may want to pass that "credit" to someone else.  Bad publicity has plagued Saccharin since the 1980's when it was widely critized as a cancer causing agent.  So why is Saccharin still used? Because its probably the least expensive artificial sweetener on the planet and as more cancer research is performed, it seems that nearly anything "may cause cancer".  On the other hand, NutrasweetTM is primarily composed of Apartame (developed by Monsanto of St. Louis, MO).  Aspartame has yet to be proven significantly harmful.  You may want to keep this in mind the next time you're at the grocery store, but also remember that moderation could be you're safest bet.

     In the September 1998 edition of Chemical Engineering magazine, Agnes Shanley and Mildred Santos report that the U.S. consumes 50% of the global production of artificial sweeteners.  Perhaps even more amazing are the projections expected through the year 2005 for these two sweeteners.  The charts below were compiled from data provided by the Fredonia Group.  The data shows what negative press can do to a chemical in the U.S.  Don't forget though, sugar still works!


ChE Plus Subscriber - Click Here for a Printable Version

Fill out your email address to
receive notification of site updates
and instantly receive five technical
questions and answers
!
Email Address:
First Name:
Last Name:

State:

Country:

Industry:

Position:

Signup Remove