Newest Articles
ChExpress-August 19, 2010
ChExpress-August 5, 2010
ChExpress-July 22, 2010
ChExpress-July 12, 2010
ChExpress-June 24, 2010
ChExpress-June 10, 2010
ChExpress-May 27, 2010
Energy Efficient Hot and Cold Water
Electrical Process Tomography
Biodiesel: The Road Ahead
Methanol Plant Capacity Enhancement
Plate and Frame Heat Exchangers: Preliminary Design
Compressor Surging Under Control
Plant and Equipment Wellness, Part 1: Observing Variability


| More



smalllogo.gif (6368 bytes)

Download a Printable Version Here (Adobe Acrobat Format)

Pyrophoric Iron Fires

ironfires4.gif (1229 bytes)
ironfires5.gif (1838 bytes)
ironfires6.gif (1295 bytes)
ironfires7.gif (1207 bytes)

Case Studies: Pyrophoric Iron Fires

The history of refining is replete with cases of fires and explosions due to pyrophoric iron ignitions. A few of these cases are discussed below (details like the location and date of the incidents are not included), to give the reader an idea of the nature of pyrophoric iron fires and the lessons learned.

 

Pyrophoric fire/explosion inside a Vacuum column in a Crude Unit

During a turnaround in the Crude Unit the vacuum column was being prepared for handover to maintenance.  The oil was removed from the column and the column was steam purged.   A water washing connection was made in the light vacuum gas oil (LVGO) reflux pump suction.  Meanwhile, instruction was given for removal of a 40-inch spool piece in the column overhead line to facilitate overhead exchanger blinding.  Air ingress occurred from this open flange, leading to auto-ignition of pyrophoric iron sulfide inside.  An explosion took place causing damage to the internals.  White smoke (SO2) was also observed at the open end. Nitrogen injection and water washing were immediately begun to quench the heat and halt the oxidation reaction inside the column.

Lessons learned:

Before carrying out any maintenance activity on overhead exchangers, proper water washing and blinding must be completed.  Full-face blinds should be provided wherever spool pieces are dropped.

 

Pyrophoric Fire inside the floating head cover of a Naphtha Stabilizer Reboiler

During a maintenance and inspection (M&I) shutdown, after steaming of the reboiler loop, the floating head cover of the naphtha stabilizer reboiler (S&T exchanger) was opened so the bundle could be pulled for cleaning. The head cover was left in the open position. After about 2 days, fire and smoke was observed from the head cover. It was determined that the fire occurred because of the PIS ignition of residual hydrocarbons. The fire was immediately extinguished with water. The cover was thoroughly flushed with water and kept wet.

Lesson learned: Whenever exchangers in naphtha service (containing sulfur) are opened for maintenance, the exchanger areas must be properly water washed for PIS removal. No amount of steaming can ensure full removal of PIS or residual hydrocarbons.

 

Pyrophoric Fire inside a Naphtha Tank

A naphtha tank (floating head type) was emptied out for maintenance. It was left unattended for one month. One day, flames and smoke were observed coming from the tank. Upon investigation, it was found that PIS had ignited leading to combustion of residual naphtha in the tank.

Lessons learned: Tanks in high-sulfur hydrocarbon service, such as naphtha, crude, etc., must be properly emptied and washed before allowing them to remain idle for maintenance. Also, such tanks should be kept under adequate nitrogen blanketing.

 

Pyrophoric Fire inside a Hydrotreater Reactor

During a maintenance shutdown, a naphtha Hydrotreater reactor feed/effluent heat exchanger was to be opened. The reactor gas loop was thoroughly nitrogen purged. During deblinding of the exchanger air ingress occurred to the reactor causing excessive heat build up in the reactor due to a pyrophoric iron fire. The temperatures went as high as 500 oC. Heavy smoke was observed from the open flanges and the reactor platform area became hot. The heat was immediately quenched by purging with nitrogen.

Lessons learned: Whenever piping associated with a naphtha Hydrotreater reactor has to be opened, purging N2 must be kept opened during blinding and deblinding of the upstream and downstream flanges in exchangers.

 

New Case Study Submitted by Visitor on January 20, 2006

Pyrophoric Iron fire in a petrochemical unit producing Nitriles

This case study relates to a pyrophoric fire incident in an East Asian  petrochemical plant producing Acrylonitrile along with Acetonitrile and Hydrogen Cyanide as byproducts.   This was shared in an annual  meeting of licensees of this technology.

During one of the turnarounds, the flare header was taken for cleaning by steaming along with connected columns and exchangers.   When a cold cut was made on the flare header, a minor fire was observed.   Thorough investigations revealed that the flare header had a major choking with polymeric cyanides and sulfur compounds.  The exposure to open atmosphere resulted in pyrophoric iron oxidation fire.  The sulfur compounds got accumulated from the excess sulphur dioxide injected into the connected column upper portion to prevent hydrogen cyanides from polymerization.  This SO2 entered from the from the vapor space of certain equipment which is connected to general flare and not to separate HCN Flare.

Lesson learned: A highly safety-conscious participant in this meeting, subsequently provided a flanged spool piece on the flare header after the last entry point of vent gases to the flare header in his plant.   The dropping of the spool piece enables proper inspection for any deposition of sulfur compounds in the flare header. Usual precautions of steaming and nitrogen purging are essential before taking a “Cold Cut” on flare headers along with a “water curtain” to prevent fires and explosions.

Contributed by : G.Vishwanathan (vishtech03@yahoo.co.in ) , a freelance consultant on Energy Audits , Process Engineering and Trouble shooting operations. He also works as Associate Consultant with M/S. Devki Energy Consultancy Pvt. Ltd., Baroda.  He has more than 25 years of experience in petrochemical plant   operations.

 

General Precautions to Avoid Pyrophoric Iron Fires

  1. The scraps and debris collected from cleaning of filters in naphtha / crude service must be kept wet and disposed of underground.
  2. Tanks, reactors, columns, and exchangers in high-sulfur feed service must be kept properly blanketed with N2 during idle periods.
  3. All equipment and structured packing must be properly water washed and kept wet when exposed to the atmosphere.
  4. In processes where catalyst handling is required (such as in Hydrotreating and fluid catalytic cracking) caution must be taken during catalyst recharge or disposal. When unloading any spent coked catalyst, the possibility exists for iron sulfide fires. If the spent catalyst is warm and contacts oxygen, iron sulfide will ignite spontaneously and the ensuing reaction may generate enough heat to ignite carbon deposited on the catalyst. Therefore catalyst must be stripped of all hydrocarbons, cooled to about 50 o C and wetted with water to prevent it from igniting vapors. Once cooled, the used catalyst may be emptied into drums for later shipment to a regenerator or a disposal site. As the catalyst may be highly pyrophoric (containing iron sulfide, etc.), it should be dumped into drums containing an internal liner for shipment. The drum and liner should first be filled with inert gas, which is then displaced by the catalyst. The liner should be tied off and a small chunk of dry ice placed inside the drum before sealing. These precautions should protect against catalyst auto ignition.

References

By: Mukesh Sahdev, Associate Content Writer (read the author's Profile)
msahdev2000@yahoo.com

 


ChE Plus Subscriber - Click Here for a Printable Version

Fill out your email address to
receive notification of site updates
and instantly receive five technical
questions and answers
!
Email Address:
First Name:
Last Name:

State:

Country:

Industry:

Position:

Signup Remove