Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

- - - - -

The Thermodynamic Parameters Of Saturated Steam


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 James-Zhou

James-Zhou

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 4 posts

Posted 07 November 2012 - 01:06 AM

the thermodynamic parameters of saturated steam at 2000Kpa is:
P1=2000Kpa,
t1=212.2℃,
intencity 10.0338kg/m³,
enthalpy H1=2799.7 kj/kg

and the parameters at 20000Kpa is :
P2=20000Kpa,
t2=365.6℃,
intencity 176.5961kg/m³,
enthalpy H2=2364.2 kj/kg

then according to H =U+PV
H1-H2=(U1-U2)+(P1V1-P2V2)
=>U1-U2=(H1-H2)-(P1V1-P2V2)>0
=>U1>U2
means : with the temperature dropping ,the internal energy is increasing ! its not sensible !
Do someone know how can this happen ?

#2 kkala

kkala

    Gold Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,939 posts

Posted 11 November 2012 - 04:01 PM

1. Comparison to other steam tables shows insignificant differences, except for H2=2418.2 kJ/kg. Using your figures, P1V1-P2V2=2000/10.0338 - 20000/176.5961 kPa*m3/kg=86.07 kJ/kg (of steam). H1-H2=435.5 kJ/kg, so U1-U2=349.4 kJ/kg
2. For ideal gases, U depends only on temperature and increases with it.
For real gases, like van der Waals gases, U also increases with (specific) volume increase. In above change from state 2 to state 1, this volume increase seems to predominate over temperature decrease, resulting in increase of internal energy U.
3. See M W Zemansky, "Heat and Thermodynamics", Energy Equation, Internal energy of a van der Waals gas.
4. Seeing that it is hard to "feel" increase of U with decrease in temperature, let us assume that steam goes isothermally (365.7 oC) from state 2 to 2000 kPa, then isobarically to state 1 (212.4 oC). Using Water97-v13.xla add-in for convenience, internal energy U goes from about 2300 to 2900, then to 2600 kJ/kg. More exact values in attached "steamU.xls". This indicates predominant influence of (specific) volume increase for the specific conditions, despite the decrease in temperature.
Note: For mentioned add-in, see http://www.cheresour...water-and-steam '> http://www.cheresour...water-and-steam . This software can be downloaded free from Web.

#3 kkala

kkala

    Gold Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,939 posts

Posted 11 November 2012 - 04:13 PM

SteamU.xls reported in previous post No 2 is attached here.
For downloading mentioned add-in, see http://www.cheresour...ater-and-steam/ '> http://www.cheresour...ater-and-steam/ .

Attached Files


Edited by kkala, 11 November 2012 - 04:19 PM.


#4 narendrasony

narendrasony

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 87 posts

Posted 19 February 2013 - 07:15 AM

Old topic but still relevent.

As Kkala has pointed out, for real gases internal energy is not the function of temperature alone. Here is another explanation:

 

Internal energy is sum of Molecular kinetic energy (Translational , rotational and vibrational) and potential energy due to molecular attraction forces.

 

For ideal gases, since there are no molecular attraction forces, potential energy term is zero and internal energy is only the sum of kinetic energies which is a function of temperature alone.

 

For real gases, molecular attraction forces become significant particularly at high pressures and it reduces overall internal energy. So, at higher pressures as you increase the pressure at given temperature, internal energy decreases.

You can go from State-1 to State-2 as Kkala mentioned in Point (4) of post-2, you may see that as the pressure is increased from 2000 KPa to 20,000 KPa at 365.7 DegC, internal energy goes down from 2900 to 2300 Kj/Kg. Potential energy becomes predominant.

 

Regards

Narendra



#5 kkala

kkala

    Gold Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,939 posts

Posted 19 February 2013 - 01:54 PM

Interesting and comprehensible explanation, based on gases kinetic theory. Thanks, Narendra.






Similar Topics