Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Maximum Allowable Accumulation


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 ayan_dg

ayan_dg

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 148 posts

Posted 08 June 2010 - 02:41 AM

For a single relief valve protecting a pressure vessel , the maximum allowable accumulation is 121% of vessel MAWP for relief due to fire and 110% of vessel MAWP in all other relief scenario. My question is why for relief due to fire an allowance of 21% provided , why it is not 110% for all cases ?

#2 ankur2061

ankur2061

    Gold Member

  • Forum Moderator
  • 2,484 posts

Posted 08 June 2010 - 10:05 AM

ayan_dg,

The links below should give you the answer:

http://www.eng-tips....=213081&page=13

http://www.cheresour...sure-fire-case/


Regards,
Ankur.

#3 fallah

fallah

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 5,019 posts

Posted 09 June 2010 - 05:37 AM

ayan_dg,

Actually, PSV orifice size for 21% overpressure is a little bit lower than the size for 10% ovrpressure with the same relief load.

Because in most fire cases it is assumed the relevant vessel is going to be failed at the end of the event, this lower size would be considerable in economical point of view. As a matter of fact, keeping spare PSV of fire case in warehouse supports this concept.

Anyway, I think 121% for fire case originates from considering 10% overpressure in addition to first 10% overpressure to be considered in the cases other than fire; i.e., 1.1*110% = 121%.

Regards

#4 ayan_dg

ayan_dg

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 148 posts

Posted 14 June 2010 - 02:26 AM

fallah:

Yes, I agree with you that in Fire case the orifice size will be less than the other cases, provided relief rate is same in all cases. My question is exactly that. Suppose the vessel MAWP is 100 barg (also, it is the setpoint of the PSV). In fire case, one will allow the pressure inside the vessel to go up to 121 barg and in other cases one is not allowed it to go over 110 barg. What is so special with fire case? If the vessel can sustain a 121 barg pressure during fire case, it will be able to handle that pressure in other cases as well.

#5 fallah

fallah

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 5,019 posts

Posted 14 June 2010 - 06:09 AM

In both cases PSV begins to open at 100 barg (set point) and the difference is just in full lift point that in fire case would happen at 121 barg and in other cases at 110 barg.

Actually, assuming the vessel being isolated in the case of a fire, we have no inflow and a heat source provided. The actual flow of the relief will vary with time, but will always need more obverpressure (21%) than normal overpressure condition (10%) to keep the PSV open; otherwise, we may face with repeated opening and closing leading to the PSV to chatter.




Similar Topics