Posted 28 September 2010 - 01:47 PM
Process,
That's quite difficult question, and certainly without a single, universal answer.
When dealing with equilibrium concept in a steady state operation, we normally assume that both phases (liquid and vapor) are in equilibrium, which is the case - from a practical standpoint. Any change of process conditions inside the vessel that is sufficiently fast (e.g. closing the vapor outlet valve) will cause subcooling of liquid at the vessel bottom, while the surface liquid will be in equilibrium with vapor phase.
What is the difference between these two cases? The answer is: dynamics. In the real multiphase flow applications, vapor and liquid phase may travel through the pipe at quite different velocities, depending on fluid regime (e.g. stratified, mist, annular, or slug flow). Different velocities (and consequences arising from that - J/T cooling effects for each phase, evaporation along the pipeline, heat transfer with ambient etc.) influence deviation from ideal equilibrium. Obviously, for different cases and different flow regimes, the deviation from equilibrium conditions differs as well.
So, the true answer on your question would be: for what purposes you are trying to evaluate this phenomenon? What is the impact of predicting or not predicting accurate phase distribution? If you are interested in tracking compositional profiles and phase distribution along the pipeline, I believe using transient flow simulation software would give you satisfactory results. If you do it manually by using available flow correlations, and dividing the pipeline into several sufficiently shorts segment which obey to the adiabatic flow principles, you can evaluate pressure drop and ambient heat transfer effects on the overall phase distribution but certainly this cannot tell you how far you are from theoretical equilibrium inside the real pipeline.