I had used Aspen HYSYS to estimate the injection rate of ethylene glycol required to prevent hydrate formation in a natural gas stream. Getting 1163 lb / hr of 80 wt% EG for a decrease in the hydrate formation temperature from 42.7 º F to -20 ºF for a current 11.6 MMscfd of natural gas saturated with water at 109.6 ° F and 272.3 psia.
However, in my eagerness to check how accurate is the estimate of Aspen HYSYS, I made calculations according to Equations 20.6 and 20.8 of the GSPA manual giving me with surprise that this value is almost 200% less than that estimated by the software.
In Aspen Hysys simulation I used the Adjust tool to estimate the EG rate that make the hydrate formation utility calculates a hydrate formation temperature equal to the temperature of the mixture gas + condensate + EG aqueous solution leaving the propane chiller. So, as a result, the adjust tool gives a value of 1163lb/hr of 80 wt% EG. However, GSPA correlations give 400 lb/hr o that inhibitor.
The gas composition is as follows:
COMPONENT mole fraction.
c1 0.92976044
c2 3.00 E-02
c3 1.20 E-02
i-c4 4.26 E-03
n-c4 5.59 E-03
n-c5- 7.85 E-04
I-C5 3.27 E-03
N-C5 1.82 E-03
n-C6 3.35 E-03
CO2 2.39 E-03
O2 8.15 E-05
N2 1.77 E-03
H2O 4.91 E-03
Please, anyone of yours help me understand what I'm doing wrong.
Edited by Neizer, 16 February 2011 - 05:11 PM.