Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

How Should I Model The Evaporation Rate Of Ammonia From A Barrel?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
6 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Guest_Mattprole_*

Guest_Mattprole_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:27 AM

Hello all, this is only my second post on these forums so forgive me if I ignore some aspect of forum recommendation / policy.

I would like to know of a easy way to model the evaporation rate of ammonia from an aqueous ammonia source of approximately 29.4% wt ammonia exposed to atmosphere. We can assume that the aqueous ammonia is stored in an entirely open cylinder shaped barrel. Ideally, I'd like to model this with as little data as possible. I'm only looking for an approximation.

My first instinct has been to use Molar rate equations learned from my mass transfer class, but the math isn't as clean as I would have hoped. Do you guys have any suggestions?

~ Mattprole

#2 pavanayi

pavanayi

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 258 posts

Posted 23 May 2011 - 10:24 AM

Matt,
There have been a few threads on the same lines in this forum.
Go through and see if it helps you.

Evaporation

#3 Guest_Mattprole_*

Guest_Mattprole_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 24 May 2011 - 06:41 AM

Matt,
There have been a few threads on the same lines in this forum.
Go through and see if it helps you.

Evaporation


I followed the link, but I'm unsure if the evaporation equations provided here are appropriate to model this specific scenario. 26 Baume Ammonia is a mixture of both water and Ammonia at 29.4 wt % ammonia. The equations provided seem to assume that the pool of interest is composed of a pure species.

I provided a spreadsheet with the beginning of my calculation efforts; it includes a cut out of the equation I'd like to use for this calculation. I'm unsure of what value of Molecular Weight and vapor pressure to use; the weighed average of the mixture, or the pure values of just ammonia.

Thank you for the help thus far.

~ Mattprole

Attached Files


Edited by Mattprole, 24 May 2011 - 06:50 AM.


#4 MrShorty

MrShorty

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 517 posts

Posted 25 May 2011 - 09:41 AM

I'm unsure of what value of Molecular Weight and vapor pressure to use; the weighed average of the mixture

Assuming the equation can be applied to mixtures (which I'm not sure of either), these questions would seem to be simple VLE questions. To fix concepts, you could easily use Raoult's law to calculate the bubble point pressure of the mixture. It wouldn't be very accurate because NH3/H2O is very non-ideal, but it would help you set up the spreadsheet for how to do it. You could then figure out a more robust model (maybe an activity coefficient model??) for dealing with the deviations from Raoult's law in this system. That would give you the bubble point pressure, and then the vapor composition.

Your source for the equation claims that the molecular is supposed to be the average molecular weight of the liquid. Oftentimes the trouble with getting equations like this over the internet is that there isn't enough discussion of how the equation is derived to really understand it (I would think you would use the average molecular weight of the vapor rather than the liquid). In this case, though, I don't think it is going to make a big difference what molecular weight you use. You know the molecular weight of the mixture (whether vapor or liquid) is going to be between the molecular weight of H2O (18) and NH3 (17), so there isn't much room for error in the molecular weight, which would then introduce a small error in your evaporation rate. Where you're only looking for an approximation, pick something and put it in, or do the calculation at both extremes of 17 and 18 and see how much maximum error the molecular weight introduces.

or the pure values of just ammonia.

NIST (webbook.nist.gov) has data for the properties of pure NH3.

#5 Guest_Mattprole_*

Guest_Mattprole_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 25 May 2011 - 01:58 PM

I'm unsure of what value of Molecular Weight and vapor pressure to use; the weighed average of the mixture

Assuming the equation can be applied to mixtures (which I'm not sure of either), these questions would seem to be simple VLE questions.


I'd be happy to figure an activity coefficient model, but are we correct in assuming that the ammonia mixture is really at equilibrium? I'm thinking about an open barrel exposed to the atmosphere with variable wind speeds. I might be recalling my thermo incorrectly, but I thought variations in pressure / velocity imply that a solution is not in equilibrium. Only closed, constant pressure, constant Gibbs Energy vessels can achieve equilibrium. If I'm mistaken please let me know.

~ Mattprole

#6 MrShorty

MrShorty

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 517 posts

Posted 25 May 2011 - 02:53 PM

I'd be happy to figure an activity coefficient model, but are we correct in assuming that the ammonia mixture is really at equilibrium?

The referenced equation calls for a vapor pressure at pool temperature. Even for a pure compound, vapor pressure is an equilibrium property. Whenever someone asks me for the "vapor pressure" of a pure compound without further qualification, I assume they mean the vapor pressure of the fluid at equilibrium. Extending to liquid mixtures, I would assume they mean "bubble point" pressure, again at equilibrium.

I can't say whether there is something built into the equation in question to account for the fact that the pool might not be exactly at equilibrium. As presented, I assume that the input parameter "vapor pressure" is to be calculated at equilibrium. If the equation requires something other than "equilibrium vapor pressure", someone more familiar with the equation will have to comment.

#7 Guest_Mattprole_*

Guest_Mattprole_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 25 May 2011 - 07:43 PM

I'd be happy to figure an activity coefficient model, but are we correct in assuming that the ammonia mixture is really at equilibrium?

The referenced equation calls for a vapor pressure at pool temperature. Even for a pure compound, vapor pressure is an equilibrium property. Whenever someone asks me for the "vapor pressure" of a pure compound without further qualification, I assume they mean the vapor pressure of the fluid at equilibrium. Extending to liquid mixtures, I would assume they mean "bubble point" pressure, again at equilibrium.


I feel as if the equation I've cited is not robust enough to model what I need. I will attempt a derivation myself and check back in with my governing equations.




Similar Topics