My company is designing a flare system for a refining client.
It appears that in some of the PSV discharge lines there is sonic flow at the enlarger on the outlet of the PSV. This is predicted by AFT Arrow-we do not have Flarenet.
This choking is only predicted if we model a short stub of pipe (PSV discharge size) and the enlarger separately from the downstream piping. If we model all of the piping at the larger diameter and incorporate an appropriate K-value to account for the enlarger, choking is not predicted.
If this is really occuring, it can cause the backpressure to exceed the allowable backpressure regardless of the diameter of the discharge piping. It seems that this choking is due to the PSV discharge flange size and has nothing to do with downstream piping.
Is this an anolomy of our model? Has anyone else had this problem?
|

Choking In Psv Discharge Upstream Of Enlarger
Started by Guest_Chris Ploetz_*, Aug 12 2005 08:55 AM
3 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Guest_Chris Ploetz_*
Posted 12 August 2005 - 08:55 AM
#2
Posted 12 April 2007 - 08:14 PM
I think I have similar problem like chcockin is small segment of weldolet. If you can read my memo post on 13 April by Kryz.
In regards of Arrow program. This software is good in sonic chocking detection. It is worth to contact AFT support regarding hydraulics model, or even Trey Walters, AFT President, he his good expertise in compressible flow. Reading his paper is good source of reference "Gas Flow Calculations. Don't Choke". It can be download from AFT web site, or I can also send PDF.
Perhaps if you discharge to atmosphere you dealing with pressure when gas is less compressed having higher velocity at the end. When connect to header the gas is more compressed at the end of pipe, because of header backpressure, therefore velocity is smaller (not sonic). I think if you change pipe size for outlet (increase) it should reduce backpressure. Just applying reducer and larger pipe.
In regards of chocking on the flange. My colleague from work asked similar question, saying how PSV with 2 inch flange can discharge such capacity, or something similar. This is something to ask the PSV vendors like Farris for example. It looks like we doubt if PSV is properly designed by saying that PSV without any connected discharge pipe may have problem in discharging rated capacity. They must have answer why they selected such outlet flange size for given orifice size.
I noticed in my case when I have backpressure too high I looked at Farris program for bellows option PSV. I could not find the same outlet flange size. My conventional PSV was 2 inch size, but corresponding model in bellows family for increased backpressure 3 inch. It was something which give me to think. The inlet PSV was the same for both 1.5 inch.
In regards of Arrow program. This software is good in sonic chocking detection. It is worth to contact AFT support regarding hydraulics model, or even Trey Walters, AFT President, he his good expertise in compressible flow. Reading his paper is good source of reference "Gas Flow Calculations. Don't Choke". It can be download from AFT web site, or I can also send PDF.
Perhaps if you discharge to atmosphere you dealing with pressure when gas is less compressed having higher velocity at the end. When connect to header the gas is more compressed at the end of pipe, because of header backpressure, therefore velocity is smaller (not sonic). I think if you change pipe size for outlet (increase) it should reduce backpressure. Just applying reducer and larger pipe.
In regards of chocking on the flange. My colleague from work asked similar question, saying how PSV with 2 inch flange can discharge such capacity, or something similar. This is something to ask the PSV vendors like Farris for example. It looks like we doubt if PSV is properly designed by saying that PSV without any connected discharge pipe may have problem in discharging rated capacity. They must have answer why they selected such outlet flange size for given orifice size.
I noticed in my case when I have backpressure too high I looked at Farris program for bellows option PSV. I could not find the same outlet flange size. My conventional PSV was 2 inch size, but corresponding model in bellows family for increased backpressure 3 inch. It was something which give me to think. The inlet PSV was the same for both 1.5 inch.
#3
Posted 13 April 2007 - 06:21 AM
Three good and instructive articles are to found free and downloadable at the Applied Flow Technology website: http://www.aft.com/news/
They are:
Applied Flow Technology Article Featured in Chemical Processing (06/15/2002)
Optimizing Pumping Systems to Minimize First or Life Cycle Cost (03/18/2002)
Chemical Engineering - Gas Calculations: Don´t Choke (01/31/2000)
#4
Posted 13 April 2007 - 08:30 AM
Mr Montemayor,
Thanks for your links.
Links as follow for ease of others...
Applied Flow Technology website: http://www.aft.com/news/
1) Applied Flow Technology Article Featured in Chemical Processing (06/15/2002)
http://www.aft.com/n...hemProc6-02.pdf
2) Optimizing Pumping Systems to Minimize First or Life Cycle Cost (03/18/2002)
http://www.aft.com/n...ing_Systems.pdf
3) Chemical Engineering - Gas Calculations: Don´t Choke (01/31/2000)
http://www.aft.com/n...low Reprint.pdf
Kryz,
This phenomenon is normally called secondary choke. Once process engineer checked and found that secondary choke occured at the outlet of PSV, one may take the following measures :
Hope above helps...
regards,
JoeWong
Thanks for your links.
Links as follow for ease of others...
Applied Flow Technology website: http://www.aft.com/news/
1) Applied Flow Technology Article Featured in Chemical Processing (06/15/2002)
http://www.aft.com/n...hemProc6-02.pdf
2) Optimizing Pumping Systems to Minimize First or Life Cycle Cost (03/18/2002)
http://www.aft.com/n...ing_Systems.pdf
3) Chemical Engineering - Gas Calculations: Don´t Choke (01/31/2000)
http://www.aft.com/n...low Reprint.pdf
Kryz,
This phenomenon is normally called secondary choke. Once process engineer checked and found that secondary choke occured at the outlet of PSV, one may take the following measures :
- Select next larger outlet flange size available within the same orifice size (API STD 526)
- Select a type of PSV with a higher allowable back-pressure
- Divide the relief requirement among two or more valves
- Recheck after above actions
Hope above helps...
regards,
JoeWong

Similar Topics
Physical Properties Of Liquid Discharge For Kod SizingStarted by Guest_mahmooddalvi09_* , 26 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Recip Compressor Discharge PrvsStarted by Guest_go-fish_* , 15 Oct 2022 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Discharge Head Or Differential Head, Pump CurveStarted by Guest_panoska_* , 11 Nov 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() How To Use 'choking Pressure Ratio'Started by Guest_Sansan_* , 27 Oct 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Positive Displacement Pump Psv Discharge LocationStarted by Guest_QuantumEng_* , 24 Jul 2024 |
|
![]() |