I had made measurements on existing "fluidized bed coolers" in a fertilizer plant (1979), which cooled granulated ammoniun nitrate product, trying to assess whether these could be also used for granulated phosphoric fertilizers. The adopted terminology "fluidized bed cooler" was rather misleading; the solids were not completely fluidized on air, but rather jumping and moving along an inclined perforated steel sheet, receiving air from down upwards. "Walking floor cooler" would be a more precise term, as seen now in Web.
Flow pattern of solids looked rather complicated in mentioned coolers. Air (N2 in your case) pressure drop through the bed was depending on bed thickness, which was also depending on sheet inclination. More air flow rate would shift more product to cyclones, less would result in insufficient cooling (or even plugging) - at the same time air could promote or delay movement of product (granulated solids). Extent of sheet perforation played also a role. After few measurements, I wrote a report and quitted. But all these points, plus heat transfer, can make a good challenge for a complete thesis (or similar), supported by a pilot plant.
Googling "walking floor cooler" in web, you can find interesting material, including the attached reprint from KHD. It does not specify heat transfer rates, but it contains a heat balance and could be useful in the first steps (if you have not read it already). Hopefully some other member can offer specific help.
I wish good success in your patient (yet rather exciting) task.
Edited by kkala, 03 September 2011 - 10:42 AM.