Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Optimum Velocity Of Vapors In Distillation Column

distillation flooding vapor velocity column diameter

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
5 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 ashokg9

ashokg9

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 11 posts

Posted 03 October 2011 - 06:52 AM

Hi,
In order to calculate the diameter of a distillation column, we have to consider the optimum vapor velocity as 50% to 70% of flooding velocity.

If we maintain vapor velocity much less, then weeping takes place and much more vapor velocity leads to flooding.

What is the effect on separation if we consider the operating vapor velocity less than 50% and more than 70% ?


Thanks,
Ashok

Edited by ashokg9, 03 October 2011 - 06:54 AM.


#2 latexman

latexman

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 1,814 posts

Posted 04 October 2011 - 06:17 AM

Efficiency suffers resulting in a poorer separation.

#3 S.AHMAD

S.AHMAD

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 786 posts

Posted 04 October 2011 - 08:35 PM

More vapor (low L/V ratio) results in liquid entrainment, distillate contains more heavy ends. Less vapor (high L/v ratio) results in weeping, more light ends in the bottom product.

#4 ashokg9

ashokg9

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 11 posts

Posted 05 October 2011 - 05:04 AM

Thank you Ahmad and latexman.

#5 katmar

katmar

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 687 posts

Posted 08 October 2011 - 12:55 AM

The 70% of flooding point is not selected because of maximum efficiency and separation. It is used to give some safety factor for wrong data, poor fit of flooding correlations and potential growth in business. If you are confident of your design - for example if it is a direct scale up/down of an existing well know process - then you can design for more than 70% of the calculated flood point and you will get better tray efficiencies and separation than you would at 70%.

Fortunately the efficiency curve is generally fairly flat between 60% at 90% of flooding and the effect of a slight design error is usually not too bad. And in my experience the flooding correlations are mostly fairly conservative. I have done analysis on several columns that were operating well, but should have been flooding according to the correlations. It also depends on the quality of your operators and control system. As you get closer to flooding the column does need to run as steadily as possible and any excursions in the operating parameters can result in process instability. This is another reason why the 70% value is used for design.

#6 dips

dips

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 11 January 2013 - 01:32 PM

Ashok,
If suppose my column operates at 90 % of flooding velocity then, which parameters should be monitored to reduce the degree of flooding velocity ?
Means how we maintain the flooding velocity in range of 50-70 % of flooding velocity ?
Please Guide.




Similar Topics