|

Mass Fraction Or Mole Fraction
Started by Phenom, Dec 26 2011 05:18 AM
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 26 December 2011 - 05:18 AM
Hello!
I have 3 sources available for solubilities of data and I need to compare them with the results I have obtained. Which is the most efficient way to compare - use of mass fraction or use of mole fraction?
Thank you in advance.
I have 3 sources available for solubilities of data and I need to compare them with the results I have obtained. Which is the most efficient way to compare - use of mass fraction or use of mole fraction?
Thank you in advance.
#2
Posted 30 December 2011 - 02:06 AM
I assume mole fraction is the efficient way to analyse the data
#3
Posted 30 December 2011 - 05:11 AM
What difference in makes in your opinion when the entire data is consistent in either mass fraction or mol facrtion.Hello! I have 3 sources available for solubilities of data and I need to compare them with the results I have obtained. Which is the most efficient way to compare - use of mass fraction or use of mole fraction? Thank you in advance.
#4
Posted 03 January 2012 - 09:34 AM
I'm not sure there is a single, universally correct answer for this question.Which is the most efficient way to compare - use of mass fraction or use of mole fraction?
I recall one set of solubilities my coworker was looking at where the solubilities were constant from solvent to solvent when looked at on a molal basis, so we compared those data that way. If we had used mole fraction, there would have been an additional parameter needed to describe the data.
Some like to use volume fraction when comparing/modeling polymer/solvent systems. Something about how the small molecule can only "interact" with a small part of the large polymer molecules causes these people to prefer volume fraction over mole fraction.
Most EOS/activity coefficient equations that I'm used to are solved for mole fraction. If I'm using these equations/programs to compare/model the data, it is usually easier to work with mole fractions.
In the end, it really depends on what comparison shows the trends in the data (if any) in a way that is most meaningful. Because there are situations like the above, I'm not sure there is a single one-size-fits-all answer to the question.
#5
Posted 03 January 2012 - 07:52 PM
Dear members
1. For comparison purpose, it does not matter to use mole fraction, mass fraction of volume fraction. As long as you understand the implication.
2. However, for most engineering calculations, using mole fraction is more UNIVERSAL. E.g. partial pressure of gas = mole fraction x total pressure is applicable to all perfect gases.
3. Finally, we end up a mass balance.
1. For comparison purpose, it does not matter to use mole fraction, mass fraction of volume fraction. As long as you understand the implication.
2. However, for most engineering calculations, using mole fraction is more UNIVERSAL. E.g. partial pressure of gas = mole fraction x total pressure is applicable to all perfect gases.
3. Finally, we end up a mass balance.
Edited by S.AHMAD, 03 January 2012 - 08:07 PM.
Similar Topics
Steam Methane Reforming Mass BalanceStarted by Guest_buskivi_* , 05 Jan 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Constant Volume Vs Constant Mass Flow Of Centrifugal CompressorsStarted by Guest_panoska_* , 18 Nov 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
Maximum Mass Flow In A Shell & Tube Heat ExchangerStarted by Guest_DonStalke_* , 22 Sep 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Need Help To Figure Out How To Make Mass And Energy BalanceStarted by Guest_James Clerk Maxwell_* , 20 Aug 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Mass And Energy Balance For Column / Confusion With UtilitiesStarted by Guest_weliketorave_* , 19 Aug 2024 |
|
![]() |