Process 12; This is my point of view regarding two system:Power requirements: The main consumer of energy in the cooling system is the refrigeration compressor while the condenser coolant input will have almost the same energy requirement in both systems (open and closed loop), the main point of comparison to the energy consumption is represented by the compressor power in both systems. The refrigeration system of closed cycle requires less power compared to compression open loop system. Energy savings can be more than 1MW per train compression when using the closed cycle cooling. Higher content of ethane caused by rapid vaporization and increasing the condensing pressure in the open system cooling may explain the difference in power of compression between the two systems.
Efficiency of the process: closed refrigeration will work with efficiency higher than the open system, for which the closed system gets more cooling per unit of energy consumption.
Ease of operation: It was determined that the open method of cooling is less tolerant to the possible presence of ethane and lighter contaminants in the feed of NGL. The ethane is accumulated during the stages of expansion to reach very high concentrations (17% molar in some cases) in the steam inlet of the last compression stage, therefore increases the pressure of condensation. This fact significantly increases the total power required in the compression cycle.
The light contaminants in the NGL feed needs to be continuously purged when selecting the open loop system.
The closed loop system is more complex but that the open loop by using additional coolers. However, the closed refrigeration system works independently without being affected by operational problems or disruptions that may occur upstream.
ReliabilityIn the closed cooling system, propane refrigerant composition is not affected by any disturbance that might occur upstream. Thus, the refrigeration cycle should function independently. Also, the composition of the propane product does not change during the cycle.
Open system with respect to cooling, propane refrigerant composition will be affected by any disturbance that might occur upstream, in this way, the refrigeration cycle does not operate independently. Additionally, propane product composition is slightly modified during the cycle due to successive sprays. This discussion reflects the benefits of independence and availability of closed-loop system in comparison to the open loop system.
In general, the refrigeration system closed loop is not affected by the quality of the product fractionation propane or by the same amount as it is a closed cycle with propane storage system refrigerant. Therefore, the closed loop system has much greater availability and reliability
Finally, it is obvious that the closed loop system provides increased major investment, because the number of equipment is higher, but costs are lower operational as discussed above.
Is recommended to make a selection matrix factors including: initial investment, operating costs, reliability, operability and efficiency of the process. In the end everything will depend on customer requirements.
Regards.