Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Material Balance - Recycle/purge Problem.


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
No replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 WestwoodChemE

WestwoodChemE

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 12:59 AM

Hello,

I would appreciate any assistance; when I try to solve this nonlinear system of equations I find that the balances (as I have written them) are underspecified. I am not sure whether the problem is ill-posed (this is an exploratory problem as part of an open-ended design project) or if I need to revise my equations.

It is a classic reaction loop problem with a flash separator & a purge. I would like to solve with matlab (newton's method) but before I do that I need to make sure that I have set the system up correctly.

reaction: a + 3 b --> 2 c
inert: d

streams:
1=makeup; 2 = reactor feed; 3 = reactor effluent; 4 = separator bottoms; 5 = separator overhead (goes to purge intersection); 6 = purge; 7 = recycle gas (from purge intersection to feed-makeup intersection)

Givens:
Flow rate of all 4 species in stream 1 is given: n1a,n1b,n1c,n1d.
One pass fractional conversion of species A in reactor is X1p.
Split fraction in flash separator of all 4 species is given: phia,phib,phic,phid
Overall conversion of a in the system = 96 %

Unknowns:
flowrates of all species in streams 2-7 & recycle fraction R. (6*4 + 1 = 25 unknowns)

Balances:
-4 @ makeup-recycle intersection
-4 @ reactor
-8 @ flash separator
-8 @ purge point
-1 @ overall inert balance

Code:



phia = 0.9;
phib = 0.9;
phic = (1-0.7653);
phid = 1;

n1a = 5110;
n1b = 15330;
n1c = 0;
n1d = 72;

X1p = .2;

%Mixer (4 equations @ makeup-recycle intersection)
F1 = n2a - n7a - n1a;
F2 = n2b - n7b - n1b;
F3 = n2c - n7c - n1c;
F4 = n2d - n7d - n1d;
%Reactor (4 equations)
F5 = n3a - n2a*(1-X1p);
F6 = n3b - (n2b-3*X1p*n2a);
F7 = n3c - 2*X1p*n2a;
F8 = n3d - n2d;%Flash/Separations (8 equations)
F9 = n5a - phia*n3a;
F10 = n4a - (1-phia)*n3a;
F11 = n5b - phib*n3b;
F12 = n4b - (1-phib)*n3b;
F13 = n5c - phic*n3c;
F14 = n4c - (1-phic)*n3c;
F15 = n5d - phid*n3d;
F16 = n4d - (1-phid)*n3d;
%Purge Intersection (8 equations)
F17 = n5a - n6a - n7a;
F18 = n5b - n6b - n7b;
F19 = n5c - n6c - n7c;
F20 = n5d - n6d - n7d;
F21 = n5a*R - n7a;
F22 = n5b*R - n7a;
F23 = n5c*R - n7c;
F24 = n5d*R - n7d;
%Overall Inert Balance
F25 = n1d - n6d;

I am especially not sure as to whether my 25th equation should be an overall inert balance or if I somehow need to work the 96% overall conversion in. Either equation still results in an underspecified system. Do I have too many equations somewhere else?

Again, thanks for your time.

Edited by Ankur Amlani, 23 April 2012 - 12:59 AM.





Similar Topics