We have a horizontal shell and tube exchanger with slurry being through tube side. We used to face frequent fouling and precipitation issues in the tubes that drops heat transfer efficiency and requires chemical and/or mechanical cleaning. What is the best engineering practice for such applications? does it help to put the exchanger in vertical or inclined position? Appreciate all thoughts.
|

Shell And Tube Exchanger In Slurry Applications
Started by , Jun 08 2012 11:49 AM
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 08 June 2012 - 11:49 AM
#2
Posted 08 June 2012 - 08:42 PM
Look into a spiral heat exchanger. They've solved many of these problems over the years.
#3
Posted 09 June 2012 - 11:39 AM
Mohammad:
Chris is giving you some solid and valued advice. You have the wrong type of exchanger applied in this service.
I love this topic. I have had so much success in the past in applying spiral exchangers in challenging services that I have frequently written on this topic in our Forums in the past. Please refer to the attached pictures I just took of something I keep on my desktop. I think the pictures literally say a thousand words.
I don't sell or sponsor Alfa Laval spiral exchangers. I have no interest in doing so. However, the fact that they cost more than the conventional TEMA shell & tube types is important to note because my experience in difficult applications (such as yours) have demonstrated that the extra capital cost is easily justified and merited when one applies the constant and hazardous expenses of applying shutdown time, maintenance labor, hazardous and dangerous chemicals, and the wear and tear of heavy and repeated physical cleanings, the obvious superior characteristics of the spiral exchanger come to the surface:
Chris is giving you some solid and valued advice. You have the wrong type of exchanger applied in this service.
I love this topic. I have had so much success in the past in applying spiral exchangers in challenging services that I have frequently written on this topic in our Forums in the past. Please refer to the attached pictures I just took of something I keep on my desktop. I think the pictures literally say a thousand words.
I don't sell or sponsor Alfa Laval spiral exchangers. I have no interest in doing so. However, the fact that they cost more than the conventional TEMA shell & tube types is important to note because my experience in difficult applications (such as yours) have demonstrated that the extra capital cost is easily justified and merited when one applies the constant and hazardous expenses of applying shutdown time, maintenance labor, hazardous and dangerous chemicals, and the wear and tear of heavy and repeated physical cleanings, the obvious superior characteristics of the spiral exchanger come to the surface:
- It handles slurries without plugging. And even if an occasional large solid get through and causes a plug-up, the unit is opened 100% (on either side) and quickly (in under an hour) and simply put back into service.
- The inherent very large (and efficient) surface heat transfer coefficients obtained with spiral flow are well-known. This feature makes the unit much smaller and compact than the shell & tube.
- The relatively small foot print makes for less expensive and simpler piping and valving.
Attached Files
Similar Topics
Steam Pressure In Heat ExchangerStarted by Guest_mvanrijnbach_* , 15 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Rotated Triangular Tube Layout Vs Triangular Tube LayoutStarted by Guest_Heat Transfer Novice_* , 28 Sep 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
Heat Exchanger Steam FlowStarted by Guest_aliebrahem17_* , 25 Nov 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Supercritical Fluid Flowrate - He Tube RuptureStarted by Guest_flarewolf_* , 07 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Cross Over Temperature In Countercurrent Heat ExchangerStarted by Guest_panoska_* , 18 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |