I agree with Fr3dd that more specific data should be known, as well as whether the topic concerns a new or existing installation. The query seems to ask for a way to specify design pressures / PSV around a steam flash drum. A basic design of numerous flash drums (2004, delivered but whole project postponed) had emerged the issues mentioned in previous posts. A summary specifically concerning these issues follows.
1. Steam condensate piping design pressure had better be same as that of condensing steam, in case there are isolation valves;
http://www.cheresources.com/invision/topic/8710-steam-condensate-design-pressure. This was respected for the line upstream flash drum. Nevertheless the drum was protected by a PSV set at design pressure of MP (medium pressure) steam network connected to the flash steam. Existing installation in the Refinery had already applied this scheme.
2. Sizing of PSV covered the
fire case, as well as
blocked outlet downstream.
The blocked outlet case included HP (high pressure)
steam escape from any single condensate pot of the relevant Units, due to its LC failure (there were LCVs, no steam traps). LCV was assumed 100% opened, with its bypass valve 50% (1.5*Cv, same valve Cv for bypass).
The latter event was judged credible during Units startup, not making a double contingency. HP steam escape (from the single condensate LCV of highest Cv) was considered under the condition that (α) only dry HP steam escapes, rest Units do not provide condensate yet, (β) dry HP steam escapes, mixed with HP condensate of all rest units. Both cases happened to result in almost same volumetric flow rate upstream PRV, yet temperature of drum feed was much higher in (α).
Note: Flash drum design temperature was specified same as of MP steam (having some superheat - backflow to drum possible), but maximum operating HP steam temperature was additionally noted as short term exposure temperature for the drum.Attached "Fldrum.doc" tries to make above points clearer, along with this text. These are hopefully helpful as examples, considering causes of overpressure and ways out for the design of 2004. Moreover applicable measures can be different in the query case, due to complexity of each individual situation. As Dacs has pointed out, some HAZOP study should be conducted (extending to downstream equipment too) to determine the proper measures for the present case.
Edited by kkala, 18 August 2012 - 12:32 PM.