Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Steam Flow Calculation With The Measured Steam Pressure


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Guest_Erman Sevinc_*

Guest_Erman Sevinc_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 21 February 2006 - 03:57 PM

Hi all,

I have a problem with calculating the unmeasured steam flow entering a falling film reboiler (forced) of a distillation column. The only corresponding measurements available are sump temperature, pressures of the steam supply side and after the control valve. My first guess was Bernoulli. However, I believe in this case, with the given steam supply and after valve pressure, Bernoulli equation would not give realistic solution for the condensing steam. I think, the system should be formulated with energy balance and heat transfer mechanism instead. But in this case there is an unknown heat transfer coefficient (U).
Energy balance: Q=m.deltaH=U.A.deltaT
deltaT=Tsump-Tsteam
Tsteam=f(psteam) from Antoine equation lnpsteam=A+B/C+Tsteam
U=unknown and should be estimated!
A= Area of the heat exchanger=known
deltaH=Enthalphy of vaporization=from the steam tables


I look forward to hearing your opinions/suggestions about the problem.

Erman

#2 Guest_Arvind Prasad_*

Guest_Arvind Prasad_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 22 February 2006 - 09:16 AM

You are right that this can be solved only by heat balance. Bernoullis equation is used for isothermal conditions. To findout the U for your equipment you can read about unsteady state heat transfer in "Process heat transfer" by DQ Kern. You are welcome for further clarifications

Prof Arvind Prasad(India)

#3 Guest_Kiran G Parihar_*

Guest_Kiran G Parihar_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 23 February 2006 - 05:33 AM

If you have DP across the control valve and the details of control valve, you can calculate the flowrate using ISA 75.01 Control valve equations !!!. Why do you need to calculate via energy balance (maybe I did not got the question well)???

Kiran G Parihar

#4 djack77494

djack77494

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 1,282 posts

Posted 23 February 2006 - 01:40 PM

Erman,
I cannot understand why a flow measuring instrument would not have been placed in your steam line. Lacking that, however, I think your choices are by heat balance or (possibly) by hydraulics. Whatever pressure measurements you have (sounds like just two) can determine pressure differentials. Then, if you know the resistance, you can calculate the flowrate. That may not be possible in your case because you must know the resistance. If your resistance includes a modulating valve that would be expected to be opening and closing, then the resistance is not fixed and this method will not work. Use the heat balance method until you get a chance to put a flow meter in the line.

BTW, Q = U.A.deltaT is not a energy balance equation; it is a heat transfer equation. Approaching the problem by heat transfer is difficult and error prone. I would recommend against it. I would think it easier to estimate the boil-up you are achieving in the reboiler, calculate the heat gain needed, and then calculate the steam needed to provide this heat. That's a true energy balance, and the heat transfer equations are totally avoided.
Doug

#5 proinwv

proinwv

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 391 posts

Posted 23 February 2006 - 08:19 PM

Hi,

I agree with Kiran. If you can measure the inlet and outlet conditions to a control valve you can calc the flow from that. Your manufacturer should have a program to do so, with their valve constants included. The caveat is if the valve is not at 100% stroke it might be difficult to determine the Cv. I would consult them on that.

These calcs should be within 10%, if that is good enough.

Also, why not an orifice meter in the lnlet line do do the same, but with more accuracy?




Similar Topics