Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Absorber Design


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
5 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Guest_Tan Yingyan_*

Guest_Tan Yingyan_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 26 February 2006 - 06:30 AM

Hi i am designing a column for absorption of products. This is used in the ammoxidation process of propylene to acrylonitrile. Can I know what kind of column to use, packed or tray column? Also, how is the diameter of the column related to the height of the column. Thank you.

#2 chemsep05

chemsep05

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 31 posts

Posted 01 March 2006 - 01:24 AM

I would suggest a RDC (Rotating Disc Contactor) column, the diameter and height are related through several equations, usually a RDC will be fairly small in size, you may in most cases have to choose the height and diameter

#3 siretb

siretb

    ChE Jedi

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 304 posts

Posted 02 March 2006 - 09:54 AM

A RDC (rotating disc contactor) is mostly used for Liquid Liquid extraction. I do not know the ammoxidation process for proplylene to acrylonitrile, but unless pressure is very high, the propylene is gaseous. So I would question the RDC choice.
So I would rather think that suitable technolgy would be a packed colmun, or a trayed column.
The choice between a trayed column and a packed column will depend upon many parameters, including
the absolute pressure you operate at, the L and V rates, .... and fouling tendency.
Packing is specially desirable if a low pressure drop is needed. Is that the case?
Packing works best at low flow parameters, and with non-fouling mixtures.
I hope this helps. If you need more, please por=st additional information (flows aroud the unit, esp.)

#4 Guest_Tan Ying Yan_*

Guest_Tan Ying Yan_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 15 March 2006 - 08:28 PM

Thank you. I have my data.

Gas flow rate = 8917kmol/h
Gas temp = 80 degress celcius
Liquid flow rate = 24751kmol/h
Liquid temp = 5 degrees celcius

Pressure used = 200kPa

I think my column needs to take into account heat effects as the system is non-isothermal
Please advice on how I can go about doing it.
The diameter was calculated to be about 4.3 m. I think it is too big for me to use a packed column as
according to industrial standards, the maximum diameter for a packed column is around 2 feet.
I hope my assumption is correct and a tray column is the reasonable choice.

#5 siretb

siretb

    ChE Jedi

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 304 posts

Posted 16 March 2006 - 06:56 AM

No, a packed column can be much much larger in diameter than 2ft. Of course, you need to select the proper packingb, but a few meters is no problem at all.

As for your diameter, 4.3m seems low to me, at least for V=8917kmols/hour and L=24571 kilomols/hour and 200 kPa. What vapour density do you use? What tray spacing do you use?

To account for the heat effect you'll need a thermodynamical model that does that. If they are very significant (regarding the heat capacity of the liquid flowing) you'll vaporize more.

#6 hana85

hana85

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 3 posts

Posted 09 August 2011 - 05:08 AM

Thank you. I have my data.

Gas flow rate = 8917kmol/h
Gas temp = 80 degress celcius
Liquid flow rate = 24751kmol/h
Liquid temp = 5 degrees celcius

Pressure used = 200kPa

I think my column needs to take into account heat effects as the system is non-isothermal
Please advice on how I can go about doing it.
The diameter was calculated to be about 4.3 m. I think it is too big for me to use a packed column as
according to industrial standards, the maximum diameter for a packed column is around 2 feet.
I hope my assumption is correct and a tray column is the reasonable choice.

how did u calculate the diameter using the data u have?




Similar Topics