Ravi:
I think what you have submitted is a copy of a Universal Boschi specification sheet for one of their air separation plants. I have found numerous errors, flaws, typos, and mistaken descriptions in their literature and website and for that reason I have taken their information and attempted to organize and list it in a logical, correct manner. Attached is my version of what they publish in their website. From the listing I have formatted, you will get a better description of what they produce and the capacities of their various columns - in liquid and gaseous states.
Contrary to what Bodhisatya states, I have always found that designers/fabricators of air separation columns identify their plants in any variety of units as they please. The large, "tonnage" plants have been traditionally labeled in "tons/day". This has been used because the large plants almost always produce a base load, liquid product that is stored and distributed as such. Consequently, metering, invoicing, and accounting units are usually tons of product. When a gaseous product is required, vaporizers (usually ambient) are employed to produce the gas product. From a distribution, logistical, and sales point of view it is much more efficient and economical to handle the product in the liquid state - whenever that is possible. Since I believe that you are in the industrial gas business, you will recognize the fact that the transport and handling of liquefied gases is exceedingly much more efficient and cost effective than it is in the gaseous state. In the USA, for example, I doubt if you will find any reasonable consumer of compressed gases - such as Oxygen, Nitrogen, and CO2 - receiving and storing gas in high pressure cylinders anymore. Almost all major customers resort to the liquefied product and vaporize it on site as needed. Hospitals are a very good example of this where oxygen is concerned; carbonated beverage bottlers are another in the case of CO2. In the developing countries, however, high pressure cylinders are still used - mainly because of a lack of supporting infrastructure and technology.
It is always much easier to accurately and efficiently account for compressed gases in MASS units than it is in gaseous units. Everyone has their own version of what is a "standard" or "normal" state and not every customer knows how to make the conversions correctly or accurately. That's why CO2 is always invoiced and accounted for in mass units - regardless of the quantities involved. You will note that even Universal Boschi is guilty of failing to identify accurately what the capacity of their air requirement is for each plant size. They fail to identify what they mean by "m3/hr" when specifying gas flow rate. That is just bad engineering identification and, unfortunately, very prevalent in the engineering world.