I'm working on a change of the flow (circulation) of amine absorption in existing column. This is a tray column. I want to check if the column diameter will be sufficient for a new conditions (greater circulation of amine). I draw attention to the parameters of a column such as fraction flooding (at a known diameter) and rich amine load (MDEA 0.5 mol / mol). Are there any parameters of the column to which I should pay attention to?
I will be very greatful for any suggestions.
Regards,
|

Checking Amine Column Hydraulics
#1
Posted 03 June 2014 - 06:25 AM
#2
Posted 03 June 2014 - 06:44 AM
Hydraulically, the fraction flooding is the main indicator of proper sizing of the amine absorber. If you maintain a flooding under 80%, you are very likely to be within the other more obscure constraints.
I would also add these process parameters to your list to monitor:
- Lean/Rich Approach H2S
- Lean/Rich Appraoch CO2
- Rich Loading
- Reboiler duty/Rating (make sure the overdesign stays above 5%)
- Reboiler vapor (make sure CO2 is below 5% in this stream
- Lean/Rich Exchanger (maintain a reasonable temperature approach and fraction over design)
The above parameters, coupled with the fraction flooding will give you a very good picture of whether you can increase your circulation rate. I would recommend using the ProMax scenario tool to do this, as that would take a matter of minutes, as opposed to going through and doing each case manually.
#3
Posted 03 June 2014 - 06:47 AM
Hi,
Overdesign percent on circulation flowrate in basic design stage, also is to be considered...
#4
Posted 06 June 2014 - 05:06 AM
Hydraulically, the fraction flooding is the main indicator of proper sizing of the amine absorber. If you maintain a flooding under 80%, you are very likely to be within the other more obscure constraints.
I would also add these process parameters to your list to monitor:
- Lean/Rich Approach H2S
- Lean/Rich Appraoch CO2
- Rich Loading
- Reboiler duty/Rating (make sure the overdesign stays above 5%)
- Reboiler vapor (make sure CO2 is below 5% in this stream
- Lean/Rich Exchanger (maintain a reasonable temperature approach and fraction over design)
The above parameters, coupled with the fraction flooding will give you a very good picture of whether you can increase your circulation rate. I would recommend using the ProMax scenario tool to do this, as that would take a matter of minutes, as opposed to going through and doing each case manually.
Thank's for your message, and very useful information. I'll pay attention to these parameters too.
#5
Posted 09 June 2014 - 02:06 PM
No problem. Good luck!
Similar Topics
Refinery Lpg Deethanizer Column DesignStarted by Guest_Ilyes_* , 15 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Methanol Water Distillation ColumnStarted by Guest_Kakashi-01_* , 27 Jan 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Aspen V11 Help On Radfrac Distillation Column ErrorStarted by Guest_savinedanglokta_* , 13 Nov 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
Pressure Drop Due To Entry Loss At Liquid And Gases Inside The ColumnStarted by Guest_SANDEEPCH_* , 24 Oct 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Batch Distillation Column DesignStarted by Guest_Mubie_Bear_* , 18 Sep 2024 |
|
![]() |