Mariana:
After many years process designing, purchasing, installing, and operating many types and sizes of reciprocating compressors, I have submitted many recommendations and comments on our Forum on the topic. If you use our Search Engine, you will find hundreds of threads on the general topic and lots of responses on the specific topic of capacity controls – how and when to use them.
It is very important to be specific about what you are dealing with when it comes to reciprocating compressors. If you want specific answers, you must furnish specific data: what make, type of compressor do you have? What is the driver? What is the application? Do you require INSTANTANEOUS or momentary capacity control, or do you need intermittent capacity reduction from time to time that will last for a reasonable period? If this is a propane refrigeration system, it could be either. Is the suction feed controlled or is downstream target the flow setting criteria? In other words, does reducing the capacity cause a backup or pressure increase in your suction source? What type of cylinders do you have – single or double-acting? Are the cylinders balanced-opposed? Are you in contact with your compressor’s manufacturer and have you this resource for loading information and recommendations?
Now to respond to your specific queries:
Since reciprocating compressors displace the same volume, my question is the following: what would happen if the flow rate decreases to 500 cfm?
Assuming you maintain the net discharge flow rate and pressure constant, the horsepower will decrease if you use clearance pockets or plug valves. The power will remain the same if you use recycle valve controls (but with aftercooling of the recycle to match the suction temperature). Admittedly, it will be difficult to maintain the suction of -40 oF, but that’s why I insist you tell us the application and how it is controlled. Raising the suction temperature will decrease the suction specific density and increase the discharge temperature. I would not control capacity this way.
the minimum capacity I can obtain (with clearance pockets) would be 866 cfm (50%), it's still higher than 500 cfm.
How do you determine the minimum capacity with clearance pockets? Is this information from your manufacturer? Depending on the application, you may have capability of decreasing the volumetric capacity of certain cylinders. Anything affecting the cylinder and piston rod loads should always be approved by the manufacturer. If you are not intimately familiar with reciprocating machines, the mechanical design, and the thermodynamics involved in their design, then you should get someone who is or become an expert yourself before modifying any operating features of the machine. I have amassed a lot of information on reciprocating compressors and I have been working on putting a Tutorial for some years. It is still “work in progress”. If you request specific information, I may have it to share.
Would another regulation method be needed?
Again, this can’t be answered with the data you’ve furnished (or failed to furnish). Read the many documents I have uploaded in prior threads that discuss and help determine the type of capacity controls available and recommended.
Is there a way to estimate the suction pressure or the compression ratio? discharge temperature?
Yes there is. Refer to the attached typical plant process calculations I did for some hydrogen compressors many years ago and you will have your answer and an instructional way of how to estimate the operational capacities of a reciprocating compressor. Nothing has changed in the last 75 years; calculations are still basic and done the same way. Note that the operation of a reciprocating compressor is an ADIABATIC process (as opposed to Polytropic). Therefore, there is no polytropic “n” involved in defining the operation. The adiabatic “k” is what is still used because the operation is as close to an adiabatic one as it can get. Every major compressor manufacturer I’ve dealt with in the past has attested to this.
Is it very unsafe to use this machine, with a capacity of 866 acfm, to compress 500 cfm?
Again, knowing that the cylinder and piston rod loadings are affected, it should be common sense that dictates that you should always be mindful of your compressor manufacturer’s basic mechanical design and OBEY WHAT IS SPECIFIED for your machine as maximum and minimum operating characteristics. This has already been mentioned above. It should be your job as an engineer to also understand the "whys" and consequences of straying from the recommendations. For example, it is common sense to expect a compressor capacity and power demand decrease by simply reducing the machine's speed (i.e., when a gas engine is the driver); however, the speed reduction also reduces the lubrication pump capacity because this pump is normally driven off of the compressor's crankshaft. This could cause a major lubrication failure. This should highlight the importance I give to an engineer knowing the intimate details of the mechanical machine he is modifying or proposing to modify. In my opinion, being a chemical engineer does not absolve us of learning the skills involved in other engineering disciplines - mechanical design, instrumentation, electrical power, hydraulics, etc.
I would also add one further comment on the subject of reciprocating compressor capacity controls: don't forget that you are dealing with a POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT machine. This type of machinery requires many times that the machine be started up and shut down in the UNLOADED condition. This is a matter having to do with the mechanical design of the rotors, crankshafts, peak power demand, and lubrication issues involved in the specific installation. So be mindful that you may be able to combine the capacity controls with startup and shutdown needs.
HydrogenCompression.xlsx 154.53KB
99 downloads
Reciprocating Compressor Capacity Controls.docx 36.05KB
115 downloads