Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

3

Help On Simulation Of Reactor In Aspen Plus

aspen plus reactor cstr drm reaction

5 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 m.ghaziasgar

m.ghaziasgar

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 6 posts

Posted 06 January 2025 - 11:57 AM

Hey everyone!
I’m simulating a DRM reactor in Aspen Plus (with RWGS and coke formation side reactions) using an LHHW kinetics model I found in the literature. The constants all seem correct, but my simulation results are way off—my conversion rates hover around 5%, while the experimental data is around 46%. I suspect this discrepancy is due to missing info in the experimental paper (I had to guess certain parameters).

I’m wondering if anyone has advice on which parameters to vary first or how to systematically approach finding a better fit. I have attached an image representing some reported parameters in the paper are fixed and match the experiment, so those I can’t change. Any tips or guidance would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks in advance!

 



#2 breizh

breizh

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 6,624 posts

Posted 07 January 2025 - 05:56 AM

Hi,

No image shared!

To share use the button "more replies option" , bottom right.

Breizh



#3 Pilesar

Pilesar

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 1,505 posts

Posted 07 January 2025 - 07:22 AM

1) Check your units of measure very carefully. Perhaps find someone else to check them also. We can be blind to our own mistakes.

2) Contact the author of the experimental paper and send them your calcs and questions.



#4 m.ghaziasgar

m.ghaziasgar

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 6 posts

Posted 08 January 2025 - 06:37 AM

These are experiment conditions and I am not able to change them:

1) pressure

2) temperature of the reactor

3) the feed ratio => (CO2/CH4/N2 = 1:1:0.22)

4) Reactor dimensions (Diameter = 0.03 m, height = 0.51m)

5) all the properties related to catalyst (e.g. catalyst loading, particle size and density)

6) the GHSV (2000 h^-1)

 

these 6 parameters are known but data about the feed flowrate is missing.

 

I think the reason that I am not getting results is because I don't define the GHSV properly. how can I validly define GHSV in CSTR model in Aspen Plus? (Should I define it through residence time spec?)

 

 

Attached Files


Edited by m.ghaziasgar, 08 January 2025 - 06:38 AM.


#5 PingPong

PingPong

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 1,465 posts

Posted 09 January 2025 - 10:05 AM


I think the reason that I am not getting results is because I don't define the GHSV properly. how can I validly define GHSV in CSTR model in Aspen Plus? (Should I define it through residence time spec?)

CSTR ?

 

Shouldn't you use a Plug Flow Reactor model ?



#6 breizh

breizh

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 6,624 posts

Posted 10 January 2025 - 07:26 AM

Hi,

Agree with Ping Pong.

PFR,

example attached 

https://www.matec-co...che21_06002.pdf

Breizh






Similar Topics