Atmospheric crude towers are complicated models! So much depends on feed characterization and selection of pseudocomponents. Trying to match side draws is tricky. Matching the top distillate is more 'that is close enough' instead of 'look how precise a model I made.'
My guess is that inaccuracies in feed characterization will have much greater impact on your model than whether the correct minivalves are used.
I would be surprised if Hysys does not have an option to characterize standard fixed valve trays. Hysys will NOT be able to represent superfrac trays very well. Even KG-Tower will tell you to contact KochGlitsch if you want to model superfrac trays.
If it were me, I would consider estimating performance using sieve trays with a fudge factor if I could confirm the results with plant data. The fudge factor may be as simple as making the column diameter in the model wider where you have superfrac trays.
KochGlitsch does have technical support. You should be able to send them your converged Hysys results and have them help. They have offered to do that for me but I am hesitant to rely on someone else to do my modeling. What I have done is to send two disparate feed cases to them and then use the answers they send back to adjust parameters in my model to match. Once my model is tuned to give their results, I no longer have to iterate with KG and can adjust the column feed within a reasonable range as long as I keep the tuning parameters constant. For a crude column, some portions of the tower will be constrained more than others. You may need several feed cases to identify the bottlenecks.