Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Standard Orifice Sizes


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 E-Tantoy

E-Tantoy

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 19 posts

Posted 29 June 2007 - 03:42 AM

Hello! Good day!

I have some questions... laugh.gif

I am doing PSV Sizing for a Shell Project. In their procedure, not all PRV sizes are available, say orifice G, J, M and N are not to be selected. In this case, I always choose the next higher size. For example, I have calculated am orifice area of 19.2cm2, orifice L is a little small so M would be enough. But since this size is not permitted to be used based on their procedure, P would be the proper size, skipping orifice sizes M and N. My questions are:

1. Isn't this relief valve oversized and there is a high risk that this will chatter? huh.gif
2. I was thinking of converting it to a multiple relief valve so that I can have smaller standard orifice size that will give me closer area with my calculated value. But on the second thought, considering engineering economics, this would be more costly. Do you think changing it to multiple relief valve would be more appropriate? blink.gif

Thanks! laugh.gif

#2 pleckner

pleckner

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 564 posts

Posted 29 June 2007 - 07:40 AM

You won't have "chatter" is the true sense, you will have cycling. Neither is a good thing but cycling is slower and usually doesn't cause damage to the valve.

I would ask why they skip these particular PSV sizes, if not for anything else but to learn and understand their reasoning. As engineers, we should not take things just on face value, we need to understand why and if not for what you are currently doing then for the future.

Look into the multiple relief valve system. Maybe it will be cost effective. Only by getting the number can you tell for sure. Selecting a grossly oversized PSV presents more problems than just cycling. How about sizing the downstream piping and equipment (if there is any)? Add this cost into your analysis as well.

#3 JoeWong

JoeWong

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 1,223 posts

Posted 29 June 2007 - 09:27 AM

Yes. As long as your inlet line lost based on rated flow is lower than 3% of set pressure (per API recomendation, your PSV probably will not chatter. This is general understanding. In addition, the gas PSV with pop action characteristic will furher minimise chattering. But the negative side, oversized PSV result extremely high rated flow and the pressure will drop so fast and touch the low pressure tripping point and eventually causing unit (or plant) shutdown...

SHELL DEP also limit PSV to "P" maximum...I guess it has to do with low allowable set pressure, extremely high PWL, etc. If you get the answer from your counter part, appreciate you can drop some note in this forum for the benefits of all...

JoeWong smile.gif




Similar Topics