Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Liquid Ejector


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 joker1

joker1

    Junior Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 11 posts

Posted 29 May 2008 - 06:44 AM

Can someone help me design a vacuum system based on liquid ejector ? This process involves the condensation of solvent (eg. hexane) at 20 Torr. The solvent must be water-free (because water is detrimental to the catalyst used in the process) which eliminates the use of steam jet. The solvent is reused.
Vapor in: 3000 kg/h hexane vapor + 30 kg/h air at 150 C, 20 Torr
Utilities available: refrigerant (down to -40 C)
I am thinking of using refrigerated solvent as the motive fluid for liquid ejectors as well as to quench the vapor by direct contact (similar to a barometric condenser).

A mechanical compression/ liquid ring pump system is currently used. I have had little assistance from companies such as Croll Reynolds.

Many thanks

#2 Art Montemayor

Art Montemayor

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 5,782 posts

Posted 29 May 2008 - 07:45 AM

Joker:

Have you consulted with Graham at:
www.graham-mfg.com ?

They allow you to download their VacWorks II software design program to assist you in such vacuum solvent applications.

They may not help you with the liquid ejector scope you have fixed, but they may have some other help for you. I would try them - if you haven't done so yet.

You seem to be tolerating a lot of air infiltration (30 kg/hr = 14.4 Scfm = 802.2 Acfm @ 150 oC & 20 Torr. Is this your estimate, or is this a real figure?


#3 joker1

joker1

    Junior Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 11 posts

Posted 30 May 2008 - 07:34 AM

QUOTE (Art Montemayor @ May 29 2008, 07:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Joker:

Have you consulted with Graham at:
www.graham-mfg.com ?

They allow you to download their VacWorks II software design program to assist you in such vacuum solvent applications.

They may not help you with the liquid ejector scope you have fixed, but they may have some other help for you. I would try them - if you haven't done so yet.

You seem to be tolerating a lot of air infiltration (30 kg/hr = 14.4 Scfm = 802.2 Acfm @ 150 oC & 20 Torr. Is this your estimate, or is this a real figure?




Hi Art,

Yes I have contacted Graham although I have not tried their VacWorks software. Graham as well as the majority of companies do not offer large or multiple parallel liquid jet systems. There seems to be very little literature available especially when the motive fluid also acts as the quench medium. Bird, Stewart & Lightfoot's Transport Phenomena has only a short example about the liquid-liquid ejector in Chapter 7. In this case I believe the major phenomenon is condensation which shrinks the vapor volume and contributes most to creating vacuum.

You are right about the air ingress. The estimate of 30 kg/h is extremely conservative.

Thanks for your input.

#4 Ali66

Ali66

    Junior Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 19 posts

Posted 30 May 2008 - 08:09 AM

QUOTE (joker1 @ May 29 2008, 07:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Can someone help me design a vacuum system based on liquid ejector ? This process involves the condensation of solvent (eg. hexane) at 20 Torr. The solvent must be water-free (because water is detrimental to the catalyst used in the process) which eliminates the use of steam jet. The solvent is reused.
Vapor in: 3000 kg/h hexane vapor + 30 kg/h air at 150 C, 20 Torr
Utilities available: refrigerant (down to -40 C)
I am thinking of using refrigerated solvent as the motive fluid for liquid ejectors as well as to quench the vapor by direct contact (similar to a barometric condenser).

A mechanical compression/ liquid ring pump system is currently used. I have had little assistance from companies such as Croll Reynolds.

Many thanks


Hi Joker1,

I don't have specific numbers but I think using liquid ejectors would require a very high flow rate and/or multiple parallel units to pull the vapor load you stated. There may be other, easier options.

I have three questions:

1) What is the challenge/issue with your current setup?

2) What is the first compression stage you are currently using, i.e. from 20 torr to what pressure? If the 1st stage is reliable maybe it can be disconnected from your current setup and become part of a new, hopefully easier, arrangement.

3) Why can't you limit air ingress? 20 Torr is not too-deep a vacuum and air ingress is readily preventable (substantially). Unless you are using very large and old equipment.

Ali




Similar Topics