Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

- - - - -

Heat Transfer


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
6 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 ColorMan

ColorMan

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 17 posts

Posted 20 June 2008 - 09:10 AM

i am trying to determine if it is better to have laminar or turbalent flow for my system.

i have a hot material (nylon 6) that needs to be cooled. so i will have a jacketed wall (heat exchange plate) that will have water running through it.

should i use dimensions that will result in laminar or turbalent flow?

also, i am having trouble finding a simple equation to use that involves laminar flow in order to calculate my reynalds number.

thanx!

#2 Root

Root

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 293 posts

Posted 21 June 2008 - 01:07 PM

Hi,

To Find out the nature of flow, calculate the Reynolds Number from this Equation.
ReN=Mass of fluid X Dia meter of pipe/viscosity of that fluid

after calculating the Reynold number then you will be able to know about the nature of flow and for 2nd part of your question let to explain by some expert.


Good luck

#3 ColorMan

ColorMan

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 17 posts

Posted 23 June 2008 - 07:25 AM

i understand how to determine whether it is laminar, transitional, or turbalent flow.

i am looking to determine which one results in optimal heat transfer when using water.

#4 Andree

Andree

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 140 posts

Posted 23 June 2008 - 08:07 AM

in most cases (all?) the turbulent flow results in higher heat transfer coefficients... but it also requires more energy (higher flowrate) to pump water through the same geometry

#5 ColorMan

ColorMan

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 17 posts

Posted 23 June 2008 - 08:33 AM

thanx for the reply andre.

so turbalent flow is what i'll go for.

know i am going to have a series of vertical plates that the water will be flowly through. the water will enter in the bottom of the plate, and exit the top.

my issue is that the characteriskic length is too large, which creates issues of me having turbalent flow.

i have 2 options.

1. if i have my heat exchange plates with only baffles inside (about 5) I will have to raise my pump to 80+ GPM.

2. or i could make a U-shaped path inside of the plates that will control where the water is able to flow. i can have a smaller pump in this case, but.... how will this effect my surface area?

normally the surface area would just be the height*width as in case 1, but in case 2, there seems like there would be less since the water will not be able to touch every aspect of the plate, and instead only the part where its tube is. so would i just use the surface area for the U-shaped tubes inside the heat exchange plates?

#6 joker1

joker1

    Junior Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 11 posts

Posted 26 June 2008 - 05:45 AM

Hi ColorMan,
You mentioned that you have to cool Nylon. Is it in molten form or is it a solid ? Cooling of polymers can be tricky. For example if you cool a polymer melt with cooling water the polymer will solidify at the heat transfer surface blocking all heat transfer. In fact the colder the cooling water the worse the problem.
Please describe the system to get more meaningful assistance.

#7 Guest_majster_*

Guest_majster_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 29 June 2008 - 02:17 PM

Hi ColorMan

here you can find equations to calculate heat transfer coefficient for various geometries and flow conditions:

http://www.cheresour...onvection.shtml

As Andree said, flow regime you will use, is compromise between area of heat transfer surface and power needed for coolant pump. Higher velocities of coolant will result in higher heat transfer coefficient and smaler heat transfer surfaces and in higher pressure drops and higher pump power requirments (and larger and more expensive pumps).

Best regards

Majster




Similar Topics