How does one anticipate the flowrate and blowdown flowrates in a cooling tower?
|

Cooling Tower Makeup
Started by Guest_Harry Parks_*, May 06 2004 09:21 AM
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Guest_Harry Parks_*
Posted 06 May 2004 - 09:21 AM
#2
Posted 06 May 2004 - 01:33 PM
Harry:
For a circulating cooling water system with an evaporative cooling tower, here are the pertinent equations:
A water mass balance of the system is:
M = E+D+W
Combining the water balance with a chloride balance of the system:
Cycles = M/(D+W)
Cycles = 1 + E/(D+W)
Cycles = M/(M-E)
where:
Cycles = cycles of concentration
Cycles = (Chlorides concentration in C) / (Chlorides concentration in M)
M = make-up water in volume/minute
E = evaporation in volume/minute
D = draw-off or blowdown in volume/minute
W = windage loss in volume/minute
The evaporation, E. can be obtained by a heat balance:
E = C(dT)(Cp)/H
where:
E = evaporation in gallons/minute
C = circulating water in gallons/min
H = heat of vaporization of water = approx. 1000 Btu/pound
Cp = specific heat of water = 1 Btu/pound/°F
dT = delta T = water temperature drop from top to bottom of tower
The windage loss, W, can be approximated by using:
W = 0.3 to 1.0 percent of C for a natural draft tower
W = 0.1 to 0.3 percent of C for an induced draft tower
W = approx. 0.01 percent of C if tower has windage drift eliminators
To use the above equations, you must first obtain:
(1) The circulating rate of water, C, in volume units/minute.
(2) The concentration of chlorides in the circulating water, C, and in the draw-off, D.
(3) The design windage rate from the tower manufacturer. If that is not possible, refer to the above approximations.
The typical range of cycles of concentration in cooling towers used in petroleum refineries is from 3 to 7. Cooling towers in large power plants will have much higher cycles.
For a circulating cooling water system with an evaporative cooling tower, here are the pertinent equations:
A water mass balance of the system is:
M = E+D+W
Combining the water balance with a chloride balance of the system:
Cycles = M/(D+W)
Cycles = 1 + E/(D+W)
Cycles = M/(M-E)
where:
Cycles = cycles of concentration
Cycles = (Chlorides concentration in C) / (Chlorides concentration in M)
M = make-up water in volume/minute
E = evaporation in volume/minute
D = draw-off or blowdown in volume/minute
W = windage loss in volume/minute
The evaporation, E. can be obtained by a heat balance:
E = C(dT)(Cp)/H
where:
E = evaporation in gallons/minute
C = circulating water in gallons/min
H = heat of vaporization of water = approx. 1000 Btu/pound
Cp = specific heat of water = 1 Btu/pound/°F
dT = delta T = water temperature drop from top to bottom of tower
The windage loss, W, can be approximated by using:
W = 0.3 to 1.0 percent of C for a natural draft tower
W = 0.1 to 0.3 percent of C for an induced draft tower
W = approx. 0.01 percent of C if tower has windage drift eliminators
To use the above equations, you must first obtain:
(1) The circulating rate of water, C, in volume units/minute.
(2) The concentration of chlorides in the circulating water, C, and in the draw-off, D.
(3) The design windage rate from the tower manufacturer. If that is not possible, refer to the above approximations.
The typical range of cycles of concentration in cooling towers used in petroleum refineries is from 3 to 7. Cooling towers in large power plants will have much higher cycles.
#3
Guest_Ben Thayer_*
Posted 06 May 2004 - 02:45 PM
WOW! Milton, nice job! A very good and detailed description. Especially including nice rules of thumb for the windage. I am printing a copy to include with my notes.
The cycles you mentioned of from 3 to 7 were also very close to our experiences. The item that affected this was our treatment chemicals and the quality of the makeup water.
Originally we had well water with quite high hardness and ran 3+ cycles. Later we switched to "river" water that was essentially "raw" make-up water to our local city system and increased the cycles to nearly 7.
The increase in our cycles let us significantly reduce our chemical treatment costs.
The cycles you mentioned of from 3 to 7 were also very close to our experiences. The item that affected this was our treatment chemicals and the quality of the makeup water.
Originally we had well water with quite high hardness and ran 3+ cycles. Later we switched to "river" water that was essentially "raw" make-up water to our local city system and increased the cycles to nearly 7.
The increase in our cycles let us significantly reduce our chemical treatment costs.
Similar Topics
![]() Steam Carrying Liquid From The Sour Water Stripping TowerStarted by Guest_kaidlut_* , 12 Sep 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() What Kind Of Cooling System Should I Use To Cool Down A Jacketed MixinStarted by Guest_HollyBoni_* , 31 Jan 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Ll Extraction TowerStarted by Guest_dpunnn_* , 22 Nov 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
Flash Tower With Tray In Deoiling Of Wax?Started by Guest_AnbIran_* , 01 Jul 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Absorber Tower Can't Be ConvergedStarted by Guest_dynamichysys_* , 14 Jun 2024 |
|
![]() |